+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Top progressives come out swinging against possible gas tax in bipartisan infrastructure plan since it would hurt lower-income Americans

Jun 17, 2021, 02:22 IST
Business Insider
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont).Jim Watson/Pool via AP
  • Progressives are assailing the idea of indexing the gas tax to inflation, which forms part of the infrastructure blueprint.
  • "Indexing the gas tax is just a way to raise taxes on working people next year instead of this year," a top Democrat said Wednesday.
  • The possible bump to the gas tax could generate only $35 billion over a decade.
Advertisement

Some key progressives are swinging at one particular provision in the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure framework: indexing the gas tax to inflation.

"Indexing the gas tax is just a way to raise taxes on working people next year instead of this year," Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said Wednesday during a Senate Finance Committee hearing.

Then Sen. Bernie Sanders assailed the levy, too. "Gas taxes are regressive taxes," he said on Tuesday, referring to a type of tax that disproportionately falls on lower-income Americans.

The infrastructure blueprint would largely focus spending onto physical elements like roads, bridges and highways, areas that Republicans traditionally favor. Indexing the gas tax would be one revenue source, along with repurposed coronavirus relief money and public-private partnerships.

Indexing the gas tax to inflation would not produce a major amount of revenue, however. One expert at the left-leaning Center for American Progress recently projected it would raise between $30 billion and $35 billion over 10 years.

Advertisement

Still, the proposal faces an uphill climb among both Democrats and Republicans. Some Senate Democrats are already rejecting the measure as insufficient at confronting climate change. Others are reluctant to back the proposal fearing that centrist Democrats will balk at other social spending measures in a follow-up bill.

Still, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer says Democrats are adopting a two-pronged approach at this stage: Continuing talks with Republicans while setting the stage to embark on reconciliation, a legislative maneuver that requires only 51 votes in the Senate for certain bills.

He's particularly focused on slashing harmful emissions in the infrastructure bills. "We need significant reductions in emissions through clean energy, electric vehicles, as well as funding to help manufacturers and farmers be part of the solution in fighting climate change," Schumer said early on Wednesday.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article