This banking crisis is different from the 2008-2009 financial crisis in 4 ways, Moody's chief economist Zandi says

• There are four differences between the current banking crisis and the GFC, Moody's chief economist says.
• Those include the scope of the crisis and the US government's response, Mark Zandi tweeted.

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, New York have rattled the banking sector, sparking fears of a contagion that could lead to the next global financial crisis.

Both banks were shut after a run on deposits, which drove fears that the panic could also cause a run on other regional banks.

Zandi's comments adds to views that the current banking crisis is different from the situation in 2008.

In a series of tweets on Monday, Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said the current banking crisis is different from the Global Financial Crisis, or GFC, in four key ways.

1. In the GFC, all financial institutions were impacted

The problems now occurring are being seen in a handful of small to mid-sized banks that got caught up in the tech sector's downturn and the crypto market crash, Zandi tweeted.

"In the GFC, nearly all financial institutions, big and small, got caught up in the downdraft," the economist added.

The financial crisis, which sparked the Great Recession, was one of the worst economic downturns in US history. The collapse of the US subprime mortgage market drove a liquidity squeeze in the global banking system and a sharp fall in bank lending.

2. Massive reforms to the financial sector after the GFC

To prevent another major shock to the banking system, the US implemented massive reforms to the financial system — such as the Dodd-Frank Act, which was implemented to "prevent the excessive risk-taking that led to the financial crisis," per the White House archives.

There are far more regulatory requirements for banks now than there were during the GFC, said Zandi.

He said that "these reforms require the banks to hold much more capital, be much more liquid and engage in stress tests to determine how much capital they need to weather very dark economic scenarios."

3. The US government responded swiftly to this crisis

The US government is moving swiftly in response to the crisis this time by insuring all deposits. On Sunday, mere days after the Silicon Valley Bank crisis erupted, the Federal Reserve put up a new credit facility for banks — which "stands in striking contrast to the decision to Lehman Brothers fail during the GFC," Zandi added. He told CNN on Monday the guarantee on deposits means Americans shouldn't worry about their bank deposits.

During the global financial crisis, Lehman Brothers, a major Wall Street bank at the time, collapsed on September 15, 2008, acting as the final trigger for the global financial crisis — but the economy had already been months into a housing bubble.

And while the congress put into legislation the Troubled Assets Relief Program — essentially, a $700 billion bailout — on October 3, 2008, other major regulations such as the Dodd-Frank Act was only signed into law by then President Barack Obama in July 2010.

4. The economic backdrop is different this time around

Zandi also said the economic backdrop right now is very different from that of the Great Financial Crisis.

"The economy is currently growing strongly, there are lots of jobs, and unemployment is very low. When the financial system cratered in the GFC, the economy was already 9 months into a significant recession and housing bust," Zandi tweeted.

The US GDP grew strongly in the second half of 2022, growing at an annual rate of 2.9% in the last quarter of 2022. Third-quarter GDP grew at an annual rate of 3.2%. The job market remains hot, with nonfarm payrolls rising 311,000 in February from a month ago. The unemployment rate was 3.6%.

During the Great Recession, US GDP fell 4.3% from its peak in the fourth quarter of 2007 to its trough in the second quarter of 2009. The unemployment rate hit 10% in October 2009.