+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Pennsylvania Newspaper Wants EPA To Retest Water Near Gas Wells For Methane

Aug 7, 2013, 01:41 IST

Robert Libetti/ Business InsiderLast summer, the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] ended an investigation into the potential contamination of water near natural gas wells in the town of Dimock, Penn. and determined the water was safe.

Advertisement

Now, the Scranton Times-Tribune is calling on the EPA to reopen the investigation.

An undated PowerPoint presentation uncovered by the LA Times' Neela Banerjee last week shows that some EPA staff had serious concerns about aquifers near Dimock, Penn. being contaminated with Methane.

"Methane and other gases released during drilling (including air from the drilling) apparently cause significant damage to the water quality," the report said.

But the agency stopped its inquiry last year and said the water for all 64 homes was safe to drink.

Advertisement

DeSmogBlog has obtained a copy of the PowerPoint [PPT], which focuses on the possibility of methane leaks. The problem? The Times-Tribune says the EPA's initial investigation did not test for that compound.

The discrepancy has rankled the paper's editorial board:

...the EPA PowerPoint presentation identified five water wells where the chemical composition of the methane was the same as that of the gas extracted from deep underground. And a separate Duke University study also showed that the chemical signature of methane in some water wells was the same as that of the deep methane.

The PowerPoint presentation is not a definitive contradiction of EPA's decision. But it does raise questions that the EPA is in business to answer. It should return to Dimock and use all of the technology at its disposal to do just that.

An EPA representative told the LA Times' Banerjee that the presentation represented the preliminary views of a single employee, and it didn't contradict their final assessment. Gas driller Cabot has maintains that the methane in the waters was naturally occurring, because the area is known for having shallow methane pits.

Advertisement

We visited Dimock and surrounding Susquehanna County earlier this year, and found a husband and wife with a gas well in their backyards whose water was clean, but also some (possibly) major water contamination in other nearby homes that had gas wells all around them.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article