scorecard
  1. Home
  2. Politics
  3. One tweet shows a massive problem with the death penalty

One tweet shows a massive problem with the death penalty

Christina Sterbenz   

One tweet shows a massive problem with the death penalty
Politics2 min read

The tweet above from journalist Liliana Segura refers to an Oklahoma appeals court's decision to halt an execution just three hours before the condemned man was supposed to die. 

The appeals court now has two weeks to consider evidence that may prove the innocence of Richard Glossip, who was set to be executed for allegedly orchestrating the murder of his employer. 

The fact that Glossip stared down his own death before the appeals court stepped in points to a massive flaw in the system - that innocent people can be executed. 

As it is, 2014 saw 125 exonerations - a record number, up from 87 in 2013, which also set a record. Six of the 125 were facing the death penalty. 

Glossip's last-minute reprieve was not necessarily an anomaly. 

In December 2014, an appeals court halted the execution of Scott Panetti just eight hours before he was scheduled to receive a lethal injection.

Nancy Ogden, sister of convicted murderer Richard Glossip, comforts her grandson Kevin Ogden at a demonstration protesting the scheduled execution of Glossip, at the state capitol in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 15, 2015. REUTERS/Nick Oxford

Thomson Reuters

Nancy Ogden, sister of convicted murderer Richard Glossip, comforts her grandson Kevin Ogden at a demonstration protesting the scheduled execution of Glossip, at the state capitol in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

While Panetti murdered the parents of his estranged wife and held his wife and daughter hostage for a night before surrendering to police, his medical records showed a long history of delusions. Allowed to represent himself at his 1995 trial, Panetti dressed as a cowboy and called over 200 witnesses, including John F. Kennedy, the Pope, and Jesus Christ.

Glossip was also at the center of a Supreme Court case, when he and his lawyers had tried to argue Oklahoma's use of a sedative called midazolam violated the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The drug had been involved in several prolonged executions.

The Supreme Court ruled against him and two other death row inmates in June.

NOW WATCH: New aerial footage shows aftermath of explosion in China

READ MORE ARTICLES ON


Advertisement

Advertisement