+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

NPR Catches Leon Panetta In An Apparent Lie About Civilian Casualties From Drones

Feb 5, 2013, 02:59 IST

In an interview with NPR, outgoing U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta claimed that the U.S. doesn’t carry out drone strikes when women and/or children are present.

Advertisement

However, NPR follows Panetta's remarks with evidence that the claim is dubious.

Here's the transcript:

NPR: How did the civilian deaths and the risks of civilian deaths weigh on your decision making process?

Panetta: Frankly, we made very clear that if there were any women or children we would not take the shot. I mean, that became a rule that we abided by.

Advertisement

NPR: That, if there were women or children on site, the strike was called off?

Panetta: That’s right.

Subsequently, NPR reports:

There is at least one case where U.S. officials, including Panetta, knew that a woman was present at a possible strike site, and the attack was ordered anyway. A U.S. official told NPR a strike with non-combatants in the area would only happen in "exceptional circumstances against very high-level terrorists."

TSgt Effrain Lopez

Advertisement

Blogger EmptyWheel details one of these strikes: that of Baitullah Mehsud, the leader of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) who committed terrorist attacks in Pakistan.

When Mehsud was killed by a drone strike on August 5, 2009, the CIA knew that he was with a "young girl who had recently become his second wife," and that other women and children lived at the targeted house.

Jo Becker and Scott Shane of The New York Times detailed the strike in their piece about Obama's "kill list":

Then, in August 2009, the C.I.A. director, Leon E. Panetta, told Mr. Brennan that the agency had Mr. Mehsud in its sights. But taking out the Pakistani Taliban leader, Mr. Panetta warned, did not meet Mr. Obama’s standard of “near certainty” of no innocents being killed. In fact, a strike would certainly result in such deaths: he was with his wife at his in-laws’ home.

... Mr. Obama, through Mr. Brennan, told the C.I.A. to take the shot, and Mr. Mehsud was killed, along with his wife and, by some reports, other family members as well, said a senior intelligence official.

Advertisement

As for children, the Obama administration targeted 16-year-old American citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the son of New Mexico-born cleric and al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki.

The administration doesn't have to reveal its legal justification for that strike (or any carried out by the CIA), but Panetta's apparent fib raises doubts about the administration's claims that the covert drone program is on firm legal ground.

SEE ALSO: John Brennan's 2011 Claim About Civilian Drone Casualties Is Increasingly Inexplicable

SEE ALSO: The NYU Student Tweeting Every Reported US Drone Strike Has Revealed A Disturbing Trend

SEE ALSO: The Military & Defense Facebook page for the latest updates

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article