+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Now We Know The Activist Investor's Secret Plan For Yahoo...

Oct 2, 2014, 21:17 IST

As we noted last week, the activist investor who launched a campaign against Yahoo wants to combine the company's operations with AOL.

Advertisement

The investor, Starboard, also tantalizingly suggested that this combination would leave AOL as the surviving company, not Yahoo.

Now, thanks to CNBC's John Jannarone, we know how Starboard wants to effect this combination.

Starboard wants to spin off Yahoo's core business and merge it with AOL's, leaving "Yahoo" as little more than a holding company that owns stakes in Alibaba and Yahoo Japan.

This would allow Yahoo to avoid paying more taxes on its Alibaba gains. It would also allow the company (theoretically) to unlock the value of its Asian assets without violating the agreement it just made to not sell or transfer its Alibaba stake for a year. In this plan, the Alibaba stake would be staying put - it would be Yahoo's actual business that would be unloaded.

Advertisement

To comply with US tax rules, the Yahoo holding company would have to retain a small operating business. So Yahoo would have to leave something behind. But among all of the businesses that Yahoo owns, there is almost certainly something that no longer fits well with the core.

Meanwhile...

Yahoo's core business would be spun into AOL, likely via AOL acquiring the Yahoo operations by issuing stock.

Under US tax rules, Yahoo shareholders would have to end up owning the majority of the new company. But Yahoo's operations are considerably bigger than AOL's, so this wouldn't be a high hurdle to meet.

Company names wouldn't be a deterrent: If the combined company preferred the "Yahoo" name, AOL could change its name to "Yahoo" and Yahoo could change its name to "Huge Asset Holding Company Formerly Known As Yahoo" or something more mellifluous.

Advertisement

What would be a question would be which management team would lead the combined company. Yahoo's management team? AOL's management team? Or a combination of the two?

And where would the headquarters be located?

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article