+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General Barr objecting to his conclusion that Trump did not obstruct justice in the Russia probe

May 1, 2019, 05:10 IST

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Robert Mueller testifies at a Senate Judiciary Hearing focusing on the attempted bombing incident on Northwest Flight 253 January 20, 2009 in Washington, DC. The committee's goal is to improve the effectiveness of anti-terrorism tools and inter-agency communication in an attempt to increase airline safety after the attempted Christmas bombing of the flight.Ann Heisenfelt/Getty Images

Advertisement
  • The special counsel Robert Mueller wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr last month objecting to his conclusion that President Donald Trump did not obstruct justice in the Russia investigation, according to The New York Times.
  • Mueller's team said in its final report that it would decline to make a "traditional prosecutorial judgment" on the question of obstruction, citing Justice Department guidelines that say a sitting president cannot be indicted.
  • But prosecutors laid out a mountain of evidence they had collected in the obstruction probe - including 11 possible instances of obstruction - and indicated Congress could further investigate.
  • Barr, however, sent a letter to Congress before the report was released and told lawmakers he had decided there was not enough evidence to charge Trump with an obstruction offense.

This story is breaking. Check back for updates.

The special counsel Robert Mueller wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr last month objecting to his conclusion that President Donald Trump did not obstruct justice in the Russia investigation, The New York Times reported.

In their final report in the investigation, Mueller's team wrote that they declined to make a "traditional prosecutorial judgment" on whether the president sought to thwart the Russia inquiry.

But they emphasized that this finding "does not exonerate" Trump.

Advertisement

Mueller's team added that they would not draw a conclusion on the question of obstruction because they were constrained by current DOJ policy that states a sitting president cannot be indicted.

But prosecutors laid out an extensive roadmap of all the evidence they had collected in the investigation, which included 11 possible instances of obstruction of justice by the president.

"The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred," prosecutors wrote. "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment."

Mueller's team also indicated that it believed Congress would be well suited to investigate the question of obstruction using the evidence laid out in the final report.

Before the report was released to Congress and the public, however, Barr sent a four-page letter summarizing his "principal conclusions" of Mueller's investigation to lawmakers.

Advertisement

In it, the attorney general said prosecutors "did not establish" that a conspiracy took place between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Barr also said that while Mueller's team did not come to a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice, he had consulted with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and determined there was not enough evidence to criminally charge the president with an obstruction offense.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article