A top BJP source told TOI that they would withdraw the petition. "We will deal with it after the government formation process gets over and law officers are in place," the source said.
The UPA government's petition, which sought review of the court's May 4 order, also said it would not divulge the names of LGT Bank account holders to petitioner
In fact, the new review petition reiterated the grounds it had raised in its earlier petition seeking review of the court's July 4, 2011 judgment directing setting up of an SIT headed by a retired SC judge as well as revealing the names of LGT Bank account holders.
After the court dismissed the review petition on May 1 and directed the government three days later to notify the SIT headed by Justice M B Shah, with Justice Arijit Pasayat as his deputy, the UPA government moved the petition seeking to wriggle out of the mandate of the July 4, 2011 judgment, which was reiterated in the May 1 and 4 orders.
The review petition listed 53 grounds, including elaborate arguments on separation of power, virtually telling the court that it was encroaching into the executive's domain by passing orders on how to deal with black money.
The