Men Are Getting Poorer Because The Traditional Household Is Dying

In a New York Times article, MIT Professor David Autor says that men are struggling because the traditional household is dying.

The Times' Binyamin Appelbaum reports that 63 percent of children live in two-parent homes, compared to 82 percent 40 years ago. Autor says that in single-parent homes, boys inherently have a bigger disadvantage, which stays with them for life:

The economic struggles of male workers are both a cause and an effect of the breakdown of traditional households. Men who are less successful are less attractive as partners, so women are choosing to raise children by themselves, producing sons who are less successful and attractive as partners.

“A vicious cycle may ensue,” wrote Professor Autor and his co-author, Melanie Wasserman, a graduate student, “with the poor economic prospects of less educated males creating differentially large disadvantages for their sons, thus potentially reinforcing the development of the gender gap in the next generation.”

The fall of men in the workplace is widely regarded by economists as one of the nation’s most important and puzzling trends. While men, on average, still earn more than women, the gap between them has narrowed considerably, particularly among more recent entrants to the labor force.

Autor's position also coincides with new research saying men who marry younger make more money, where the opposite is true for women.

Read the full New York Times piece here.