He had predicted
Sharma had conducted a survey of 590 people in five US states — Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Virginia — to know who would be the president of the USA.
His analysis was based on four major criteria including people's liking, trust, distrust and hate along with the content of speeches by the two candidates
The outcome of the survey showed that even as Clinton was better than Trump on political knowledge and expertise in functional competency, but both were identical in managerial ability.
It also noted that Trump was a better motivator than Clinton.
"Trump was able to provide a vision for us (US citizens) which resonated best with the average American," noted the survey, based on the views of the surveyed American people.
Sharma said Trump used 24% more abstract communication in his speeches compared to Clinton.
"Hillary focused more on data and figures in her speeches, but Trump used to deliver speeches that attracts popular sentiment, which resulted in his capturing people's support," he said.
It's not without a reason that people equate Modi's charisma with that of Donald Trump. Both are great orators who can turn the electoral game in their heavy, by connecting with masses.