+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Mattis breaks with Trump and backs US staying in Iran nuclear deal

Oct 3, 2017, 21:55 IST

U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis listens to a question during a joint press conference with Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman after their meeting in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2017.Associated Press/Manish Swarup

Advertisement

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis on Tuesday broke with the position President Donald Trump has taken against the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, during testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Asked by Independent Maine Sen. Angus King whether the deal, officially called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, was beneficial to the US, Mattis answered affirmatively.

"Do you believe it's in our national security interests at the present time to remain in the JCPOA?" King asked, adding after a brief pause, "That's a yes-or-no question."

Mattis himself paused several seconds before answering, "Yes, senator, I do."

Advertisement

Trump's hostility toward the deal - signed in 2015 by Iran, the US, Russia, France, Germany, China, and the UK - is longstanding. During his presidential campaign, Trump tarred the agreement as a "bad deal" for the US and vowed to rip it up upon taking office.

Trump has twice recertified the deal since taking office, as he is required to do every 90 days to keep Congress from reimposing sanctions. But his administration has agreed to other sanctions on Tehran, and Trump's rhetoric has signaled he's getting closer to scrapping the deal outright.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

He decision to recertify the deal a second time in mid-July only came "after hours of arguing with his top national security advisers, briefly upending a planned announcement as a legal deadline loomed," according to The New York Times.

In August, The Guardian reported that the Trump White House was pushing intelligence analysts to provide justification for declaring Iran in violation of the tenants of the deal. That pressure reportedly reminded some of the analysts involved of the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Advertisement

"They told me there was a sense of revulsion. There was a sense of déjÀ vu," said Ned Price, a former CIA analyst who served as special adviser to Obama. "There was a sense of, 'We've seen this movie before.'"

John Kerry speaks with Hossein Fereydoun and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif (R), before the Secretary and Foreign Minister addressed an international press corps gathered at the Austria Center in ViennaThomson Reuters

During Trump's address at the UN in late September, he again targeted Tehran, saying the country was a "rogue nation" and calling the nuclear deal "an embarrassment."

"It is time for the entire world to join us in demanding that Iran's government end its pursuit of death and destruction," Trump said.

Trump is also out of step with nuclear inspectors, who have found no evidence Iran has violated the deal.

Advertisement

His stance also differs from that of other signatories, four of whom signed a statement that said, "Unilateral US action that jeopardized the JCPOA would be a grave mistake" and would harm US and European interests. Israeli officials, including a former national security adviser, have also called on Washington to preserve the deal.

Some in the White House, Pentagon, and State Department are reportedly preparing from Trump not to recertify the deal by the October 15 deadline. Should he send it back to Congress, Republicans could kill it with a simple majority vote. But there's no guarantee the GOP would get that, as some members have expressed reluctance to walk away from the agreement.

NOW WATCH: An economist explains how Trump's tax plan could be great for rich Americans, but not as good for the middle class

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article