+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Lyft is wildly unprofitable and lost $911 million last year - here's how other unprofitable companies fared after they went public

Mar 30, 2019, 18:30 IST

Business Insider, company filings

Advertisement
  • Lyft went public Friday at a valuation of more than $20 billion despite recording heavy losses ahead of its initial public offering.
  • Several other money-losing tech companies, like Uber and Pinterest, are preparing IPO filings.
  • Markets Insider has compiled several examples of money-losing tech firms going public - they range from bankruptcies at Pets.com and Webvan to huge gains at Amazon.

Lyft went public Friday at a valuation of more than $20 billion despite racking up a loss in excess of $900 million in 2018. The company is just the first in a series of unprofitable "unicorns," or privately held tech companies, with valuations north of $1 billion that are thinking about going public this year.

Those include ride-sharing rival Uber, which lost $1.8 billion in 2018, and Pinterest, which recorded a loss of $63 million for the year. Both companies are preparing to file for their initial public offerings, with Uber's IPO scheduled for as early as next month.

The 2018 IPO market was extremely receptive to money-losing firms. According to data from University of Florida professor Jay Ritter, over 80% of companies that went public in 2018 were unprofitable. The trend isn't just limited to the tech and biotech sectors, with half of all IPO companies outside of those sectors reporting negative earnings.

The experience of several examples highlighted below shows the future of such firms is hard to predict. Money-losing Amazon, which went public in 1997, went on to deliver a return of more than 1,000 times for IPO investors.

Advertisement

Meanwhile heavily hyped companies such as Pets.com and Webvan declared bankruptcy within a few years of their IPOs as the dot-com bubble burst in 2001.

Here's how six different companies who were losing money at the times of their IPO have fared:

Amazon

IPO date: May 15, 1997

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $6 million loss

Net income in 2018: $10.1 billion

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $1,030.61

Market capitalization: $876.2 billion

Description: Originally created as an online bookseller, the company has morphed into an online-retail juggernaut that is sometimes referred to as "The Everything Store".

Amazon recorded net sales of $233 billion for 2018, and billionaire CEO Jeff Bezos remained upbeat despite distractions around his personal life potentially impacting the company.

Webvan

IPO date: November 5, 1999

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $12 million loss

Net income in 2018: N/A

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $0

Market capitalization: N/A

Description: Webvan promised same-day delivery of groceries from state-of-the-art fulfillment centers manned by advanced robots.

But this was in 1999, and the firm could not develop the technology in a cost-effective manner, burning through $800 million of capital before declaring bankruptcy in 2001.

Interestingly, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos aggressively hired Webvan veterans and purchased a related technology firm as he planned Amazon's own entry into the business.

Pets.com

IPO date: February 10, 2000

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $63 million loss

Net income in 2018: N/A

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $0

Market capitalization: N/A

Description: Pets.com began operations in 1998 with the goal of selling pet supplies online. Similar to Webvan, the company was hampered by poor logistics and difficulty reaching profitability, filing for bankruptcy in November 2000.

The company achieved some notoriety for its marketing campaign, which featured a sock puppet mascot. The mascot proved popular, appearing on "Good Morning America" and in a Super Bowl ad.

Amazon was also an early investor in the company, taking a majority stake before selling down in the IPO.

Tesla

IPO date: June 29, 2010

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $83 million loss

Net income in 2018: $976 million loss

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $16.33

Market capitalization: $47.9 billion

Description: Tesla was founded in 2003 by engineers seeking to prove that electric vehicles could offer a better alternative to gasoline-powered vehicles. More broadly, the company expanded its mission to "accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy."

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is often in the news as much for his antics in challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission as for the advent of new Tesla products such as the Model Y crossover.

Twitter

IPO date: November 7, 2013

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $79 million loss

Net income in 2018: $1.2 billion

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $1.27

Market capitalization: $25.3 billion

Description: One of the top social-media sites, where users can post "tweets," or short messages, to groups of recipients or the public at large.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has come under criticism for not tackling controversial tweets from figures associated with the white-nationalism movement. Despite the controversy, Twitter's financial results have strongly improved, moving from losses in 2017 to profits of more than $1 billion in 2018.

Snap

IPO date: March 2, 2017

Annual net loss prior to IPO: $515 million loss

Net income in 2018: $1.3 billion loss

Value of $1 invested in IPO: $0.64

Market capitalization: $14.5 billion

Description: Launched in 2011 as a disappearing photo-sharing app, the Snapchat app quickly gained popularity among millennials. Within a year of launch, 20 million photos were shared each day on the app. The company now has over 186 million daily active users.

In 2013, Snap famously rejected a $3 billion buyout offer from Facebook. Since then, Facebook has since been accused of copying Snap's most innovative features, including the use of filters and disappearing posts.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article