+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Justice Scalia warns that the Supreme Court is causing the 'destruction of our democratic system'

Oct 30, 2015, 02:00 IST

U.S. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia speaks at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research inReuters//Kevin Lamarque

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was extra fiery during a talk at Santa Clara University in California this week, saying in no uncertain terms that the court had been making a lot of bad decisions.

Advertisement

In his speech, Scalia said he believes the "liberal" Supreme Court is heralding the "destruction of our democratic system," according to an account from the SF Gate.

According to Scalia, the court is giving citizens rights the Constitution doesn't specifically guarantee, like gay marriage and federally subsidized health insurance.

Scalia noted that this interpretation of the Constitution as a so-called living document arose in the 1920s, when Supreme Court justices at the time interpreted the, "guarantee of due process of law to protect fundamental rights not explicitly mentioned in constitutional text," according SF Gate.

To Scalia, this was the beginning of a slippery slope that the US will struggle to recover from.

Advertisement

At the bottom of this slippery slope, according to Scalia, is the now famous Obergefell v. Hodges case that legalized gay marriage across the country. In his dissent, his position is crystal clear: "To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation."

In both of the landmark cases the Supreme Court has decided this year, Scalia has found himself in the minority. In King v. Burwell, the decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), Scalia derided his fellow justices' interpretation of the law as, "jiggery-pokery," and called the eventual decision in favor of the ACA as, "pure applesauce."

With three current judges over the age of 79 (the average age of retirement for Supreme Court justices is 78), the next president will have a lot of appointments to make. If the Democrats take the White House in 2016, Scalia will certainly have more applesauce to look forward too.

NOW WATCH: Here's why Kosovo's politicians are turning their parliament into 'Animal House'

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article