+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

JEREMY SIEGEL: Robert Shiller's Famous Stock Market Valuation Ratio Has A Big Bias

Aug 20, 2013, 04:09 IST

REUTERS/Steve MarcusLegendary UPenn-Wharton finance professor Jeremy Siegel has a problem with a valuation ratio developed by legendary Yale economist Robert Shiller.

Advertisement

In a new piece for The Financial Times, Siegel goes after Shiller's cyclically-adjusted price-earnings ratio (CAPE).

CAPE is calculated by taking the S&P 500 and dividing it by the average of ten years worth of earnings. If the ratio is above the long-term average of around 16, the stock market is considered expensive.

Siegel first gives credit to the CAPE for being able to predict long-term stock market returns in the 1980s through the 2000s.

But he's suspicious that the more recent CAPE reading may be biased by distorted low earnings numbers that are making the stock market look expensive. From the FT:

Advertisement

I believe the Cape ratio’s overly pessimistic predictions are based on biased earnings data. Changes in the accounting standards in the 1990s forced companies to charge large write-offs when assets they hold fall in price, but when assets rise in price they do not boost earnings unless the asset is sold. This change in earnings patterns is evident when comparing the cyclical behaviour of Standard and Poor’s earnings series with the after-tax profit series published in the National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA).

For the 2001-02 and 2007-09 recessions, S&P reported earnings dropped precipitously due to a few companies with huge write-offs, while NIPA earnings were more stable. Yet before 2000, the cyclical behaviour of the two series was similar. Downward biased S&P earnings send average 10-year earnings down and bias the Cape ratio upward. In fact, when NIPA profits are substituted for S&P reported earnings in the Cape model, the current market shows no overvaluation.

This is likely to generate a response from Shiller sooner or later.

Shiller made a name for himself by sharing the CAPE with the world in the first edition of his classic book Irrational Exuberance, which predicted the dotcom bubble and solidified the Yale economist as one of the smartest people in finance of all-time.

Siegel believes stocks remain attractive at current levels. He recently told CNBC that the Dow could hit 17,000 this year.

Advertisement

Read his entire piece at FT.com.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article