- The former top prosecutor who said the DOJ may bring sedition charges went rogue, an official said.
- The DOJ's professional responsibility office is investigating
Michael Sherwin over the remarks. - The judge threatened sanctions or a gag order if officials made similar comments in the future.
The federal prosecutor who said the US
John Crabb, the head of the department's DC office's criminal division, said Michael Sherwin will be investigated over his remarks. He said Sherwin - the Acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia who oversaw prosecutions against riot participants - didn't have clearance to give that interview or to discuss charges that haven't actually been brought.
"The
Sherwin made the remarks in an interview that aired Sunday. They drew widespread attention, as sedition charges haven't been sought by federal prosecutors in nearly 30 years.
The remarks also infuriated Justice Department officials, as Insider's Ryan Barber reported. Sherwin left his post as Acting US Attorney on March 3, when President Joe Biden replaced him with Channing Phillips, but remains within the Justice Department.
The judge said he might impose a gag order
The hearing Tuesday was called by Judge Amit Mehta, who is overseeing a case against members of the
At the outset of the hearing, held over Zoom, Mehta blasted the Department of Justice for the "60 Minutes" story and for comments attributed to unnamed department officials in a New York Times story about sedition charges weighed against Oath Keepers members.
Mehta said he may impose a gag order or levy sanctions against Justice Department attorneys if similar stories emerged as the case developed.
"If there are further public comments or stories of the kind we've seen in the last 48 hours, I will not hesitate to consider a gag order, and also will not hesitate to sanction any attorney that violates our local rules for making statements about this pending criminal case for pending litigation," Mehta said.
Crabb said at the hearing the Justice Department would also look into the comments made in The Times' story.
The defendants in cases weren't present at the court hearing. Several of their attorneys said they declined to comment to CBS
Mehta said comments speculating about charges made it harder to ensure the trial process is fair.
"The Department of Justice needs to understand that these types of public statements can jeopardize the integrity of the criminal case and affect the rights of the criminal defendants," Mehta said. "And this is my job to ensure that the defendants receive a fair trial."