Vanessa Bryant, the widow of Lakers superstar Kobe Bryant, leaves the U.S. Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles on Wednesday, Aug. 9, 2022. She is suing the county for graphic photos taken by first responders at the scene of the helicopter crash that killed her husband.Luis Sinco/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
- Vanessa Bryant and Chris Chester secured a mammoth $31 million verdict against LA County.
- They sued the county after cops and fire staff took and shared graphic photos from the Kobe Bryant helicopter crash.
A Los Angeles jury awarded Vanessa Bryant $16 million in damages for emotional distress in her trial against Los Angeles County first responders who took and shared photos of Kobe and Gianna Bryant's remains at the site where their helicopter crashed on January 26, 2020.
Chris Chester, whose wife Sarah and daughter Payton were also aboard the helicopter, was awarded $15 million after he and Bryant took on the county in a joint trial.
Throughout the trial, contradictions morphed into a theme – something Bryant and Chester both pointed out during their testimonies. Ultimately, the conflicting testimonies muddied what role key witnesses played at the crash site, while internal department interviews sometimes offered a clearer look to jurors.
A county attorney accused Bryant's team of nitpicking audio snippets from internal department investigations, but those interviews also provided part of a roadmap as to who ordered the photos, what they showed, and why the staff disseminated the photos.
Bryant and Chester also levied criticism of the LASD and LACFD officials who testified in the trial. Bryant said that there has been "a lot of finger-pointing." Chester said there were "inconsistencies" in the testimonies of the first responders as he sought answers.
"It seems like the number of photos keeps getting smaller as people take the stand – we went from 100 to 10 photos," Chester said.
As the deputies and captains implicated in the spread of the photos took the stand one by one over the past two weeks, they offered myriad reasons for why they took, and then shared, the graphic photos: curiosity got the better of them; they believed it was part of their job; or, as two back-to-back deputies testified, it was a way to "alleviate stress."
Attorneys for the county have maintained that the photos are "permanently deleted," and that first responders needed to take "site photography" to relay to the command post the nature of the scene, considering the crash, weather conditions, and ensuing media frenzy.
The county had no comment on the testimonies of the first responders.
Here are some of the ways that those first responders contradicted themselves and their colleagues throughout the high-stakes trial.