Inside the making of the 4-hour HBO Michael Jackson documentary, 'Leaving Neverland,' which contains harrowing allegations of child sexual abuse
- HBO's two-part documentary "Leaving Neverland" (airing Sunday and Monday) chronicles the relationship Michael Jackson had with two boys in the 1980s and 1990s.
- Director Dan Reed talked to Business Insider about the journey to get the alleged victims, now adults, to come on camera and tell their stories.
It all started over a casual breakfast in 2016.
British director Dan Reed, who is known best for his gritty documentaries about war and terrorism, was having a meal with Channel 4 executive Daniel Pearl when the topic of stories that had never been resolved came up.
As they rattled off a few, eventually they got to the allegations that Michael Jackson sexually abused young boys.
10 years after Jackson's death, it's a question that still hangs over the mythology of the King of Pop. Despite Jackson claiming his innocence and being acquitted of child molestation charges in 2005, to this day many wonder what was going on at Neverland Ranch, Jackson's palatial estate where he often had young children over.
Reed thought there were two people who might be able to answer that question.
Wade Robson and James Safechuck never met each other until they were adults, but as young boys they had something very special in common: the affection of Michael Jackson. The story of how these two fell into the world of Jackson during their youth is the focus of Reed's "Leaving Neverland," a gripping two-part, four-hour HBO documentary (part one airs on Sunday, part two airs Monday) that will change the way you look at Jackson and his legacy.
Over four hours, we are thrust into the dark side of Michael Jackson's world. In the doc, Robson and Safechuck allege the musician had sexual relationships with them over the span of years in the 1980s and 1990s.
Robson claims he was 7 when he started having sexual relations with Jackson. He was a Jackson fanatic living in Australia and won a dance contest that led to him meeting his hero. After moving to the US, Robson says he began hanging out more with Jackson, which led to a sexual relationship. The two would shower together, watch pornography together, and perform oral sex on one another, Robson claims. And when they weren't together, Robson says he and Jackson would constantly fax messages to one another (some of the faxes appear in the movie). At one point, Jackson even asked Robson's mother to let Wade stay with him for a year at Neverland Ranch, she says in the doc. When his mother declined the offer, Jackson answered, "I always get what I want," Robson's mother claims.
"Leaving Neverland" is not for the faint of heart. Both Robson and Safechuck give extremely graphic portrayals of their relationships with Jackson. Reed also interviews their mothers, siblings, and wives. The documentary is not just filled with shocking revelations, but is also an example of the manipulative power of celebrity.
Finding out what happened behind closed doors
After that 2016 breakfast when the idea sparked, Reed said he spent a year trying to get Robson and Safechuck on camera.
Though both Robson and Safechuck testified they hadn't been molested by Jackson (Safechuck during a 1993 civil case and Robson during the 2005 criminal trail), the two had gone public in 2013 claiming to have been molested by Jackson and filing separate lawsuits. But after both cases were dismissed due to the statue of limitations, they moved on with their lives. Then Reed gave them a chance to tell their stories to the public.
"For Wade, I think it was a very cathartic experience to step outside the framework of therapy or legal discussions and just say what happened," Reed told Business Insider over the phone from the UK. "And James was kind of rediscovering what was happening. As he said things he was listening to himself and going, 'Oh my god, I did that!' I think it was a new experience for them to talk to someone who wasn't a lawyer or psychiatrist."
"Their mothers are a critical part of it," Reed said. "I was filled with the absolute need to meet their mums and speak with them and try to convince them that it was a good idea for them to be in the film and talk. What I had going for me was the fact that both mums were mortified by what happened. I think that was the motivation to come forward and go on camera."
Though Reed felt Robson, Safechuck, and their families came off authentic and credible while on camera, as editing began, he went back and dove into court transcripts and other materials to corroborate their stories.
"I want to emphasize I did not go into this assuming Michael was a pedophile," Reed said. "Whatever conclusion I reached was going to be after doing as much corroboration as I could possibly do."
So the plan was to include interviews with detectives, investigators, and the prosecutors and DA from the 2005 trial. But as the edit came together, Reed realized two things: the movie would be longer than a traditional feature-length documentary, and all he needed in it were Robson, Safechuck, and their families.
That led to Reed deciding to not interview anyone else for the movie and focus on these two people and their families coming to terms with the past - and going to some very dark places to show how it occurred.
"The Jackson myth and look-the-other-way strategy that the Jackson camp has is them saying, 'Don't look at the obvious thing that he's hanging out with kids and spending the night with kids, but look the other way, look at the eccentric genius, look at his charity work and the flawed family,'" Reed said. "We had to draw a line between what might have been cuddling and affection and part of Jackson's self-styled eccentric affection for kids, and what was really happening, which is hardcore sexual activity of the type that grownups do together. That was my instruction to the guys. They knew they had to go there otherwise the movie could be dismissed as being ambiguous of what really happened."
Battling the 'Jackson machine'
"Leaving Neverland" had its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival in January and that was when Reed realized just how much people still are fascinated by Michael Jackson.
As he, Robson, and Safechuck received a standing ovation following the epic four-hour screening (with a small group of Jackson supporters protesting outside), social media was buzzing as details about the documentary began to spill online.
It led to the Jackson estate sending out a statement addressing the movie, stating it "isn't a documentary, it is the kind of tabloid character assassination Michael Jackson endured in life, and now in death." Days later, the Jackson family released a statement calling the movie a "public lynching" of the late pop star. And on the day Business Insider spoke to Reed, the Jackson estate sued HBO for $100 million for being involved with the documentary (Reed declined to comment on the suit and HBO said it has no plans to cancel the movie's airing).
The director said that around Sundance, he received a lot of hate mail from what he calls Jackson's "superfans, not the ordinary fans who are just enjoying Michael's music." He's also received death threats.
All the blowback begs the question: Would Robson and Safechuck have been willing to talk if Jackson were still alive?
"I don't know," Reed said. "Jackson inspired a tremendous amount of fear. In addition to the love and loyalty he inspired in the children that he molested he also put fear in them. They were loyal and didn't want to see him go to jail. That was powerful. The Jackson machine inspires fear, his fans are vicious. The superfans around the world are cultist and will abuse anyone who deviates from the party line. And the lawyers and the estate are getting well paid to defend the Jackson interest of a very wealthy and successful recording artist. It's a terrifying prospect."