Delhi High Court bench recuses itself from petition filed against WhatsApp, next hearing on January 18
Jan 15, 2021, 15:17 IST
A single judge bench of the Delhi High Court on Friday recused from hearing a petition against the Facebook-owned instant messaging application, WhatsApp's upcoming data and privacy policy, on the grounds that it violates the right to privacy of citizens of India.
Justice Pratibha M. Singh directed that the petition filed by advocate Chaitanya Rohilla shall be listed before another single judge bench subject to the orders of the Chief Justice.
"Let the matter be treated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)," the bench suggested.
The plea will now be listed before another bench and would come up for hearing on January 18.
The petition states that the policy gives a 360-degree profile view into a person's online activity and that this level of insight into a person's private and personal activities is done without any government oversight.
During the course of hearing, Advocate Manohar Lal appeared for the petitioner, the Centre was represented by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Chetan Sharma and senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi appeared for WhatsApp.
Among other requests, the petitioner has sought injunction against the updated Privacy Policy by WhatsApp with immediate effect.
Rohilla has also sought a direction to Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to lay down guidelines to ensure that WhatsApp does not share any data of its users with any third party or Facebook and its companies for any purpose.
"Issue guidelines or directions to ensure that any change in Privacy Policy by Respondent No. 2 (WhatsApp) is carried out strictly in accordance with the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part-III of the Constitution till such time as rules and guidelines are framed by Respondent No. 1 (Centre)," it added.
The petitioner has further submitted that the sharing of users' data by WhatsApp to third parties and Facebook is in itself illegal because the messaging platform can only use the information for purposes that are reasonably linked to the purpose for which the information was given.
The petitioner also pointed out that India, being a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), is obligated to implement essential data protection regime, in both the public and private sectors.
WhatsApp is asking users to either give their consent to sharing data with Facebook or lose their accounts after February 8.
To continue using the services, users will have to accept the terms and conditions.
If the users do not accept the new terms of service, they will no longer be able to use the app.
WhatsApp gets hit with a lawsuit in Delhi that wants the Facebook-owned messaging app to stop sharing data with third parties
The Indian government may call WhatsApp to explain why its new data privacy policy applies in India but not in Europe
WhatsApp says your privacy won't be affected if you don't use these two optional features
Advertisement
Justice Pratibha M. Singh directed that the petition filed by advocate Chaitanya Rohilla shall be listed before another single judge bench subject to the orders of the Chief Justice.
"Let the matter be treated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)," the bench suggested.
The plea will now be listed before another bench and would come up for hearing on January 18.
The petition states that the policy gives a 360-degree profile view into a person's online activity and that this level of insight into a person's private and personal activities is done without any government oversight.
Advertisement
Among other requests, the petitioner has sought injunction against the updated Privacy Policy by WhatsApp with immediate effect.
Rohilla has also sought a direction to Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to lay down guidelines to ensure that WhatsApp does not share any data of its users with any third party or Facebook and its companies for any purpose.
"Issue guidelines or directions to ensure that any change in Privacy Policy by Respondent No. 2 (WhatsApp) is carried out strictly in accordance with the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part-III of the Constitution till such time as rules and guidelines are framed by Respondent No. 1 (Centre)," it added.
The petitioner has further submitted that the sharing of users' data by WhatsApp to third parties and Facebook is in itself illegal because the messaging platform can only use the information for purposes that are reasonably linked to the purpose for which the information was given.
Advertisement
It rued that the absence of a data protection authority, it leaves the users with a company's own assurances and privacy policies.The petitioner also pointed out that India, being a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), is obligated to implement essential data protection regime, in both the public and private sectors.
WhatsApp is asking users to either give their consent to sharing data with Facebook or lose their accounts after February 8.
To continue using the services, users will have to accept the terms and conditions.
If the users do not accept the new terms of service, they will no longer be able to use the app.
Advertisement
SEE ALSO:WhatsApp gets hit with a lawsuit in Delhi that wants the Facebook-owned messaging app to stop sharing data with third parties
The Indian government may call WhatsApp to explain why its new data privacy policy applies in India but not in Europe
WhatsApp says your privacy won't be affected if you don't use these two optional features