+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

If you're laughing at the death of MoviePass, you probably aren't paying close enough attention

Sep 16, 2019, 23:56 IST

Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

Advertisement
  • MoviePass, the embattled movie-ticket subscription service, shut down over the weekend after burning hundreds of millions of dollars.
  • The service had become a joke in the industry for its unsustainable business model.
  • Contrary to a popular media narrative, however, venture capitalists were not the ones who lost money on the startup's downfall.
  • MoviePass' parent company, Helios and Matheson Analytics, flooded the public markets with millions of new shares to cover the service's massive losses.
  • Many of the losers were unsophisticated retail investors, some of whom previously spoke to Business Insider about believing in the MoviePass product.
  • One retiree investor named Ken said he had lost around $190,000 on the stock.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

MoviePass finally died over the weekend, but the movie-ticket subscription service had become a punchline long before that.

Recode's Peter Kafka summed up the general sentiment best in a tweet on Friday: "Sometimes the 'lose money on every transaction, try to make it up with volume' model doesn't pan out."

It's easy to understand why charging $10 per month and letting a subscriber see up to 30 movies in theaters per month didn't work - especially when MoviePass was paying those theaters full price for the tickets.

But what's less widely understood is who the real losers are in the MoviePass story.

Advertisement

There has been a tendency in coverage of MoviePass to treat its demise as having no sympathetic victims. That attitude is represented well by a tweet that went viral last year from The Atlantic's Derek Thompson: "MoviePass isn't a business so much as a late-capitalist welfare program that redistributes hundreds of millions of dollars from venture capital to subsidize American leisure."

The joke here hinges on the fact that venture capitalists - who can certainly afford to light a few hundred million dollars on fire - are the losers. But that's not actually what happened with MoviePass.

The venture capitalists who invested early in MoviePass were paid out when the startup was bought by Helios and Matheson Analytics in a deal that valued it at more than $50 million. After Helios and Matheson took a controlling stake in MoviePass in 2017, the service dropped its price to $10 per month and the gargantuan losses, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, began in earnest.

At the time, Helios and Matheson, which was run by penny-stock guru Ted Farnsworth and had ties to an Indian company accused of massive fraud, was listed on the Nasdaq with the ticker HMNY. To cover MoviePass' losses, Helios and Matheson flooded the market with millions of new shares.

Many retail investors who believed in the MoviePass product snatched up the new shares, only to see the value of their stakes crater as the stock fell more than 99.99%. Helios and Matheson was eventually kicked off the Nasdaq.

Advertisement

Last summer, I spoke to Helios and Matheson investors who felt betrayed both by management and by the Wall Street analysts who kept "buy" ratings on the stock for months while it plunged, as their firms made millions helping Helios and Matheson sell new shares. One retiree investor, Ken, talked to me about losing around $190,000 investing in MoviePass.

As some of my readers pointed out, those investors should have known better. Of course they should have. But it's a lot harder to laugh an unsophisticated investor who lost a big chunk of his retirement savings - like Ken did - than it is to laugh at a VC who made a bad bet.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article