+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

I tested a Sonos speaker competitor and was blown away by the audio quality

Apr 14, 2018, 21:44 IST

Bluesound

Advertisement
  • Bluesound offers wireless, streaming speakers that compete with Sonos as a higher price point.
  • I tested a speaker against my own Sonos system.
  • The Bluesound Pulse 2 is a superb choice for about $700.


We're a Sonos family. After literally years of research, I took the plunge in 2017. My first speaker was a Play:5, and a few months ago, I added a Play:1. Another Play:1 and possibly a Play:3 are on the horizon.

But that doesn't mean my immersion in high-end, wifi-based home audio systems has ended. A while back, a company called Bluesound - owned by Canada-based Lenbrook Industries - sent me some speakers to try out. I spent my time focused on the closest competitor to my Sonos Play:5 and, due to various other responsibilities and Bluesound's patience, was able to engage in some pretty extensive A-B testing.

I won't beat around the bush. The Bluesound Pulse 2 is significantly better than the Sonos Play:5. I could hear the difference, vividly, every time I sampled the device's talents.

The Pulse 2 is also $200 more expensive than the Play:5 - $700 versus $500 - and with an interface that's somewhat more difficult to use.

Advertisement

But if sound quality matters to you, the choice is easy: go with the Pulse 2.

Bluesound is a great choice for hardcore audiophiles on a budget

Don't get me wrong; the sound quality of the Play:5 is exceptionally good. That's why I chose it, and in fact I briefly considered the Bluesound setup before making the Sonos leap. I don't regret my decision. Mostly.

But if you're just beginning your streaming odyssey and want to upgrade from rudimentary Bluetooth options (without losing Bluetooth as an option - the Pulse 2 offers it, while the Play:5 doesn't), there's no question in my mind that the Pulse 2 is worth an extra 200 bucks and then some.

What we're really looking at here is the difference between a system designed for audio enthusiasts who also appreciate Apple-like ease of use - Sonos - and a system engineered by audiophiles who didn't want to go entirely in the direction of majestic and very expensive setups like the Naim products I reviewed in 2016.

My Play:5 has three tweeters and three woofers handling the bass duties, and each component has a dedicated amplifier. This configuration can mimic stereo - sort of what you might get from an old-school, two-cabinet hi-fi system - but to my ear, what the Play:5 does well is deliver great volume, good musical detail through the listening spectrum, and create a "mass" of sound about ten feet in front of the unit.

The Pulse 2 has two tweeters and a single woofer, each with its own amp. The stereo effect is less prominent, to my ear, but the sound is much bigger then the Play:5's, with more detail. Impressive given that the two units are about the same size.

I listen to everything under the sun on my Sonos system, music-wise, but I favor Tidal and pay for its hi-fi streaming service. With the Pulse 2, I was able to use my Tidal streaming subscription and listen to lossless audio. The difference was dramatic. The Pulse 2 pushed right past the Play:5, establishing an unbeatable lead that was clear on rock, pop, jazz, blues, classical - you name it.

Matthew DeBord/BI

Easy to use, with Bluetooth backup

A big differentiator is that the Pulse 2 supports Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) streaming, the top-of-the-pile for the technology. Sonos doesn't yet. Tidal makes MQA files available, and while it's not necessarily true that MQA will sound better to most people than lossless audio, I could swear that it did.

That's a kind of esoteric reason to choose the Pulse 2, so I think it's fine to go the Bluesound route if you simply want a compact streaming unit with Bluetooth backup that works with the most popular service, Spotify.

The overall Sonos experience is more seamless than the Bluesound experience, and the Sonos app is a breeze to use. Some reviewers of Bluesound products have complained that they're difficult to set up, but I had no troubles, and once I downloaded the iPhone app, I was able to connect with the streaming choices effortlessly.

Interestingly, my favorite use of the Pulse 2 was when I used the convenient integrated carrying handle to take it to my backyard for a party. I set it up in a nice, safe place and let it do its thing.

The sound was beyond room-filling. At modest volume, it took over my not large but hardly small yard, suffusing every corner with lovely tones. That was the only real moment of regret I endured, when I thought that I should have dropped the extra $200.

Simply put, Bluesound's Pulse 2 is worth a look.

NOW WATCH: This incredible animation shows how humans evolved from early life

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article