Here's what it's like to play video games on the widest computer monitor in the world

If you could pick between a regular widescreen monitor...

And Samsung's CHG90 super-ultra-wide monitor...

The impact of just how wide Samsung's CHG90 monitor is lost in the small photo above. Still, I'm going to assume that most of you would pick the wider, better, more impressive second monitor that shows you a lot more, well, game. If you chose the first screenshot, then you do you. 

Regular widescreen monitors have the same so-called "aspect ratio" — 16:9 — as your TV, and it's what we've all been used to for the last decade or so.

Samsung's CHG90 monitor is the future — a super ultra-wide future with a 32:9 aspect ratio that makes almost every video game look better and more enjoyable. It's as if someone put two 24.5-inch normal 16:9 displays next to each other and somehow removed the bezels between them.

Summed up in one sentence, playing video games on super-ultra-wide monitor is better than playing on a normal widescreen monitor.

Games are incredibly smooth – if you have the right computer and parts.

The Samsung CHG90 monitor supports a 144-hertz refresh rate, which means you can play games up to 144 frames-per-second (fps). To compare, consoles play games between 30 and 60 fps, and there's a noticeable difference when you step up above 90 fps. Movements in games become smoother and objects become clearer while you're moving.  

That's all well and good as long as you have a graphics card that's powerful enough to push out 144 fps at the monitor's 3480x1080 resolution. I used one the most powerful graphics card you can buy at the moment – an Nvidia GTX 1080Ti – and I rarely went above 125fps in "Far Cry 5." In "Battlefield 1," I could achieve 144 fps most of the time, but not always.

If you're using a less powerful graphics card, you can reduce the refresh rate on the monitor's menu to avoid stutters or other artifacts like screen tearing, where parts of the screen appear to lag behind others. 

And it's not the best option for certain games, either.

Some games aren't optimized to work on such a wide monitor. The massively popular "PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds" – or "PUBG" –  isn't optimized, for example. 

Above, you can see my character in the game's menu screen is cut off on the top and bottom.

While playing the game itself, it also appears like the image is zoomed in to compensate for the CHG90's outrageous width. 

Samsung could potentially work out support for the CHG90's 32:9 aspect ratio with Bluehole Studios, the developers behind "PUBG." 

Overall, though the CHG90 is fantastic, and I'd love for everyone to experience its wide 32:9 aspect ratio. But be warned: It's mighty expensive.

Samsung's CHG90 monitor costs $950 on Amazon at the time of writing, which is the same price as many computers out there. It's almost as expensive as the kind of powerful computer you'd need to make the most of its high refresh rate, which can cost north of $1,500.

With that in mind, think of the CHG90 monitor as that sports car you've always wanted, and a normal 16:9 monitor as a Toyota Camry. It would be awesome to drive that fast, expensive sports car, but a Camry gets you from A to B in comfort just fine. 

Adjusting back to a regular monitor with a normal 16:9 aspect ratio after using the 32:9 CHG90 is pretty easy, in my experience. I didn't feel like I needed its super ultra width to enjoy games, just like I wouldn't need the power and speed of an expensive sports car. I did appreciate the high fps for games, but there are a bunch on cheaper monitors out there — albeit not as wide — that support high fps gameplay.

Still, I've got to say, the 32:9 aspect ratio is really, really nice.

Should you buy the CHG90 super-ultra-wide monitor?

I'm absolutely sold on the super-ultra-wide 32:9 aspect ratio for gaming. But $950 is a huge asking price. 

If it were me, I'd wait a little while until more 32:9 monitors are released and the overall price tags of such monitors start coming down. But if you have the cash and you don't know what to spend it on, you can certainly make a case for the CHG90. 

If you're in the market for a new high-performance monitor right now and $950 isn't within your budget, I'd look at 21:9 ultra-wide 2K monitors. Some of the less expensive models won't have high refresh rates like the CHG90, but they offer more width than regular 16:9 monitors, and you can enjoy the sharpness and detail that comes with higher 2K resolution. If you want the smoothness that comes with high refresh rates, you can get normal widescreen 2K monitors with high 144 refresh rates for as low as $350.