Steve Kovach/Business Insider
While testing out the Surface, I kept thinking of something Microsoft's head of communications, Frank X. Shaw recently wrote.
In a blog post defending the Surface, and attacking
This flippant comment rings of the truth. It sounds right. Just make a tablet, add some games, let the users show up. Seems pretty basic for a tech company.
After using the
The Surface isn't good for gaming. It isn't good for entertainment. Maybe it's good for doing work, but personally, I don't need to do work on a tablet, and I'm not convinced the majority of people need to do work on a tablet.
The Surface doesn't even have Candy Crush, which is the most popular game on the planet right now. It doesn't have Scrabble. Those are the two games I play most on an iPad. They're also the games my Mom and wife play. They're popular with a lot of people.
As for video, I use the iPad as a mobile TV in my house. If my wife is watching something on TV, I fire up the Watch ESPN app, or the FiOS app that streams TV. This way I can watch baseball or football quietly on my own.
I didn't see either of those apps on the Surface.
As as a result, all I could do with the Surface was check Twitter, and surf the web. Those are the most basic features possible on a tablet.
And even the web and Twitter are worse on the Surface than the iPad. The software is still jaggy and inconsistent. I want to like to Surface, but I really can't think of one reason to recommend it to a normal person over the iPad.
It was not "easy" to keep myself entertained on the Surface. I just kept thinking, "What am I supposed to do with this thing?"
I wasn't going to use Excel, or Word. I was sitting around, trying to relax.
As I used it, I just kept thinking about Shaw's comments. He's wrong. It's hard to build a great device for gaming, and video, and everything else. The Surface proves it.