+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Glenn Greenwald's Partner Was Carrying A Stunning Amount Of Sensitive Documents When He Was Detained

Aug 30, 2013, 18:58 IST

REUTERS / Ricardo MoraesGlenn Greenwald's partner, David Miranda, was carrying a stunning amount of government documents when he was detained by British authorities for nine hours earlier this month.

Advertisement

And a UK national security adviser said Friday that some of those 58,000 documents were extremely sensitive to national security.

The Daily Telegraph's David Barrett tweeted out some of the details from the statement made Friday by Oliver Robbins, deputy national security adviser for intelligence, before UK judges.

Robbins was making the case that national security teams and police needed to investigate the material, which they seized earlier this month.

Some of the key points:

Advertisement

  • Robbins said that the case material included 58,000 documents that were "highly classified UK intelligence documents."
  • Among the documents was a piece of paper with the decryption password.
  • Police decrypted one file on Miranda's hard drive with the password.
  • The material contains "personal information that would allow British intelligence staff to be identified," including overseas.
  • Because of the size and scope of the material gathered, the British government believes that Edward Snowden "indiscriminately appropriated material in bulk."
  • In what could be a particularly troubling development, the UK government has "had" to assume that Snowden's data is in the hands of foreign governments to which he has traveled: Hong Kong and Russia. (Greenwald told Business Insider last week that it was "highly unlikely" that had happened, however.)
  • Robbins argued that it is "impossible" for Greenwald or any other journalist to determine which information could damage national security.

"The material seized is highly likely to describe techniques which have been crucial in life-saving counter-terrorist operations, and other intelligence activities vital to UK national security," Robbins said.

"The compromise of these methods would do serious damage to UK national security and ultimately risk lives."

The government told The Guardian newspaper that it had "no confidence in their ability to keep the material safe," and that the government "appeared to accept our assessment that their continued possession of the information was untenable."

Miranda, 28, was detained for nine hours at London's Heathrow Airport earlier this month under a UK anti-terror law, while traveling home to Brazil. He had spent a week in Berlin visiting journalist Laura Poitras, who has been working with Greenwald to publish stories based on leaked information from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Miranda is taking legal action against the government. He has argued arguing that his detention was a misuse of Schedule 7 of the UK anti-terror law and breached his human rights.

Advertisement

Miranda's trip, which was paid for by The Guardian, had the purpose of him being a courier between Greenwald and Poitras. Using encrypted thumb drives, he delivered documents to Poitras, and he came back with documents meant for Greenwald.

Greenwald blasted the detention at the time, comparing it to mafia-style methods:

This is obviously a rather profound escalation of their attacks on the news-gathering process and journalism. It's bad enough to prosecute and imprison sources. It's worse still to imprison journalists who report the truth. But to start detaining the family members and loved ones of journalists is simply despotic. Even the Mafia had ethical rules against targeting the family members of people they felt threatened by. But the UK puppets and their owners in the US national security state obviously are unconstrained by even those minimal scruples.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article