+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

'The Invisible Man' resurrects Universal's monster movies with a strategy that's more DC than Marvel

Feb 28, 2020, 20:13 IST
UniversalElisabeth Moss in "The Invisible Man"
  • "The Invisible Man," which hit theaters on Friday, is the first monster movie from Universal Pictures since its "Dark Universe" crashed and burned.
  • After "The Mummy" disappointed at the box office in 2017, the studio rethought its strategy and is focusing on standalone stories rather than a connected universe, similar to what Warner Bros. is doing with its DC movies.
  • "The Invisible Man" was produced by Blumhouse, which Universal has a first-look deal with and which specializes in low-budget horror movies ("The Invisible Man" cost just $7 million to make, a fraction of "The Mummy's" hefty budget).
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

The Dark Universe is dead. Long live the Dark Universe ... sort of.

"The Invisible Man," which debuted in theaters on Friday, is the latest monster movie from Universal Pictures, which attempted to launch its own cinematic universe of classic monsters in 2017 with "The Mummy."

"The Mummy" disappointed at the box office, raking in $80 million domestically and $409 million worldwide off of a $125 million budget before marketing costs. It put an early end to Universal's initial Dark Universe plans.

Advertisement

"I think it probably was trying to come together too quickly," Chris Morgan, a "Mummy" producer and would-be architect of the potential franchise, told io9 last year. "And I think everyone got to take a breath and take a step back and take a look at it, and now just focus on maybe doing it a little bit slower."

Marco Grob/UniversalUniversal prematurely released this cast photo of its Dark Universe in 2017.

If that sounds familiar, it's because it's similar to what happened to the DC Extended Universe, which also attempted to replicate the interconnectivity of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

After DC's answer to "The Avengers," "Justice League," disappointed at the box office, Warner Bros. rethought its DC movie strategy and is now focusing more on standalone stories like "Joker" and the upcoming "The Batman." The new direction has led to major box-office success.

Advertisement

Universal seems to be looking for a similar rebound starting with "The Invisible Man," a modern update on the classic novel by H.G. Wells (and its 1933 film adaptation) directed by Leigh Whannell and starring Elisabeth Moss. And the response to the movie has already been positive, with a 92% Rotten Tomatoes critic score.

"Every so often, a studio dusts off an old property in the hope of selling it anew, often to diminished ends," The New York Times' Manohla Dargis wrote. "With the latest version of 'The Invisible Man,' Universal has given one of its horror classics a creepy-scary overhaul with an unsettling #MeToo spin."

Starting with "The Invisible Man," instead of a universe of connected movies, Universal plans to reboot its collection of classic monsters with a focus on filmmakers' visions.

"We said to the filmmakers, tell us what you're connecting to with these characters," Universal president Peter Cramer told The Times in a story published on Thursday. "We're listening to any and all ideas, rather than trying to create a vast, interconnected universe."

Universal"The Invisible Man" (1933)

To realize that plan, Universal tightened the budget for "The Invisible Man" and teamed with the production company Blumhouse, which it has a first-look deal with and which specializes in low-budget horror movies like "Get Out" and 2018's "Halloween."

"The Invisible Man" cost just $7 million to make, a fraction of "The Mummy's" budget, and the strategy is expected to pay off. Boxoffice.com is projecting it to earn $30 million domestically this weekend and Box Office Mojo is expecting a $28 million haul. Either way, it would easily earn back its production budget.

Blumhouse founder Jason Blum told Bloomberg this week that he would "love to" make another monster movie with Universal if "The Invisible Man" succeeds.

"I've had some version of this conversation," he said. "Not a serious one. I would say to Universal, 'What monsters are available that I could play around with?' I would send those things to our seven favorite filmmakers."

Advertisement

Next up on the Universal monsters slate is "Dark Army" from "Bridesmaids" director Paul Feig that will feature a mix of new and old characters; "Invisible Woman," based on an original pitch from director Elizabeth Banks, who most recently helmed the "Charlie's Angels" reboot; and "Renfield," a movie about Dracula's henchman from "Rocketman" director Dexter Fletcher.

NOW WATCH: CRASH COURSE: An influencer explains how YouTube ads work, her advice for making more money, and how much she earns

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article