Federal regulators are wielding a classic Warren Buffett concept to go after Apple — his biggest stock bet
- The Department of Justice is suing Apple for monopolizing smartphone markets with the iPhone.
- Regulators called Apple's defenses against its rivals a "moat," borrowing Warren Buffett's metaphor.
The Department of Justice is suing Apple for monopolizing smartphone markets — and cheekily used a term coined by Warren Buffett to make its case against the investor's No. 1 stock.
Federal regulators used the word "moat" eight times in their civil antitrust complain to describe the defenses that Apple sets up to keep competitors at bay.
They alleged the iPhone maker "built and reinforced" a "wide and deep" moat around its "smartphone monopoly," and said the company "crushes innovation that might help fill in the moat."
They also wrote that Apple's "moat building has not resulted in lower prices, higher output, improved innovation, or a better user experience for smartphone users," although some may disagree.
Castles and moats
Buffett popularized the concept of a company having a "moat" around it that protects it from rivals.
The Berkshire Hathaway CEO has used the metaphor dozens of times in his yearly shareholder letters, and during his company's annual gatherings.
Here's what Buffett said about two of his favorite businesses, Coke and Gillette, in his 1993 letter:
"The might of their brand names, the attributes of their products, and the strength of their distribution systems give them an enormous competitive advantage, setting up a protective moat around their economic castles. The average company, in contrast, does battle daily without any such means of protection."The Berkshire CEO built on the idea in his 2007 letter:
"A truly great business must have an enduring 'moat' that protects excellent returns on invested capital. The dynamics of capitalism guarantee that competitors will repeatedly assault any business 'castle' that is earning high returns.
Therefore a formidable barrier such as a company's being the low-cost producer (GEICO, Costco) or possessing a powerful worldwide brand (Coca-Cola, Gillette, American Express) is essential for sustained success. Business history is filled with 'Roman Candles,' companies whose moats proved illusory and were soon crossed."
The billionaire deployed the metaphor once again during Berkshire's 2017 meeting:
"If you've got a wonderful business, even if it's a small one like See's Candy, you basically have an economic castle. And in capitalism, people are going to try and take away that castle from you.
So, you want a moat around it that can protect it. And then you want a knight in the castle that's pretty darn good at warding off marauders."