Everyone is talking about Cambridge Analytica, the Trump-linked data firm that harvested 50 million Facebook profiles - here's what's going on
- Facebook and Cambridge Analytica have been implicated in a massive data breach.
- Personal data from 50 million profiles is at stake, a former employee warned.
- The details can be hard to follow, so Business Insider has broken down what's going on.
Facebook and data analytics company Cambridge Analytica (CA) are in hot water after a whistleblower revealed that CA harvested data from 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge or consent.
Former employee Christopher Wylie went public with the story over the weekend for an extensive, densely-reported article in Britain's Observer newspaper.
The revelations have since led to British, EU, and US authorities to launch investigations into Facebook and CA - but the details can be pretty tough to keep a hold of. Here's what's going on:
What did Cambridge Analytica do?
CA harvested information from 50 million Facebook users through an external app in 2015, according to Wylie, who worked there at the time.
The data came from a personality quiz, which around 270,000 people were paid to take. The quiz - "thisisyourdigitallife" - in turn pulled data from their friends' profiles as well, ending in the enormous data stash.
What data did they get?
This included personal information on where users lived and what pages they liked, which helped build psychological profiles that analysed characteristics and personality traits.
This kind of information was later deployed in political campaigns.
Wylie said: "We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of people's profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons."
Where did it come from?
The quiz was created by Aleksandr Kogan, a Russian professor at Cambridge, who shared the information in a commercial partnership with Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL), which later created CA.
Trump's campaign hired CA in June 2016 to help target ads using voter data gathered from millions of adults in the US.
CA also assisted Leave campaigners in the run-up to the EU referendum.
Was that legal?
The data harvest, as described in the Observer, could have been illegal based on data protection law.
British legislation forbids personal data to be sold to a third party without consent.
Facebook has contested whether the information was really taken without consent. It said on Saturday: "People knowingly provided their information, no systems were infiltrated, and no passwords or sensitive pieces of information were stolen or hacked."
Also, Kogan could have broken Facebook's own rules by using the data for commercial rather than strictly academic purposes.
How is Facebook implicated?
Facebook about the way the data was being used. And, according to Wylie, it did too little to remedy the sitaution.
Facebook said it removed the quiz app from the platform in 2015 and demanded that Kogan, Wylie, and CA confirm that they had deleted all the data harvested.
Wylie, however, claimed that Facebook only demanded that he remove all the Facebook data in August 2016, and they were small steps.
He said: "They [Facebook] waited two years and did absolutely nothing to check that the data was deleted. All they asked me to do was tick a box on a form and post it back."
However, raw copies of the data obtained by CA are still available online, The New York Times reported.
Does this change Facebook and CA's previous testimonies?
The latest revelations also suggest that Facebook and CA both misled lawmakers about their actions.
Alexander Nix, CEO of CA, previously denied working with Kogan as well as using Facebook data. "We do not work with Facebook data and we do not have Facebook data," Nix told British MPs last month, as cited by The Observer.
Facebook has also denied that it gave CA data.
Simon Milner, the company's UK director of policy, told British MPs last month: "They [CA] may have lots of data, but it will not be Facebook user data. It may be data about people who are on Facebook that they have gathered themselves, but it is not data that we have provided."
Facebook has since suspended CA, SCL, and Wylie from its platform. Wylie was also suspended from WhatsApp and Instagram, which are both owned by Facebook, The Observer's Carole Cadwalladr reported.
Is Russia involved?
Possibly. Wylie's testimony has revealed a Russian connection to CA and Kogan.
According to Wylie, CA in 2014 made a pitch to Russian oil and gas company Lukoil, which was and remains sanctioned by the US.
The company was interested in understanding the link between data, behavioural microtargeting, and political campaigns, and met CA at least three times between 2014 and 2015, The New York Times reported.
Wylie told The Obsever: "It didn't make any sense to me... Why would a Russian oil company want to target information on American voters?"
Kogan, the Cambridge academic, had also been an associate professor at St Petersburg State University and received Russian government grants while creating and harvesting Facebook data through the app, The Observer reported.
Curiously, Kogan's work in Russia was never publicised, and colleagues told The Observer "no one knew" about it. Cambridge University said it was carried out in a "private capacity."
What will happen now?
Britain's Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Committee on Sunday accused Facebook and CA of "misleading" the committee, and called on the two companies to explain themselves. Theresa May has also called on Facebook and CA to cooperate with the probe.
The EU on Monday also announced that it would start an investigation into whether the data from 50 million users was misused.
Massachusetts' Attorney General, Maura Healey, also announced an investigation, but did not specify what it would be about.
Damian Collins, who chairs Britain's DCMS committee, said of Facebook on Sunday:
"The reputation of this company is being damaged by stealth, because of their constant failure to respond with clarity and authority to the questions of genuine public interest that are being directed to them.
"Someone has to take responsibility for this. It's time for Mark Zuckerberg to stop hiding behind his Facebook page."