+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Europe's lost Mars lander probably 'exploded on impact' - see the photos

Oct 21, 2016, 23:50 IST

Advertisement
This artist's view shows Schiaparelli, the entry, descent and landing demonstrator module, using its thrusters to make a soft landing on Mars on October 19.ESA/ATG medialab

When the European Space Agency (ESA) lost contact with its Schiaparelli lander on October 19, the probe was headed toward its doom: a 60-second free-fall that ended in an explosion - and a new crater on Mars.

The 8-foot-wide probe, which is just one-half of the ExoMars 2016 mission - its mother ship, the Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO), successfully entered orbit around Mars - survived atmospheric reentry and a parachute deployment.

But Paolo Ferri, the ESA's head of mission operations, said during a live video stream on Wednesday that something "unexpected" happened when Schiaparelli was supposed to turn on its rocket motors and gently plop onto the surface of Mars.

Engineers have worked day-in and day-out to deduce what happened from the last bits of data sent from the probe. And a news release issued Friday afternoon confirms it wasn't pretty.

Advertisement

The ESA's description of the spacecraft's failure was rather subdued:

"Estimates are that Schiaparelli dropped from a height of between 2 and 4 kilometres, therefore impacting at a considerable speed, greater than 300 km/h," the ESA wrote. "The relatively large size of the feature would then arise from disturbed surface material. It is also possible that the lander exploded on impact, as its thruster propellant tanks were likely still full."

In short: The probe fell out of the sky from more than a mile up, impacted the ground at more than 185 mph, and catastrophically blew up with its tanks full of propellant.

In the event there's any doubt that this happened, just look at this animation from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), which snapped a photo of Schiaparelli's suspected landing site shortly after it was supposed to land:

Advertisement
NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS

The animation alternates between two views of the site: one photographed in May 2016, and the second on October 20, 2016.

The right pane shows a zoomed-in view of the site, which clearly shows a dark spray of material that spans 130 feet wide, or roughly a 13-story building on its side.

Had Schiaparelli's landed, it would have been the ESA's first spacecraft to safely reach the surface of the red planet.

Unfortunately, these images mean the probe has joined a growing graveyard of failed Martian spacecraft.

For Russia, which collaborated with ESA on the mission, Schiaparelli is the nation's seventh failed Mars landing (though it put two satellites into orbit around Mars while it was still the Soviet Union).

Advertisement

The two-part mission is precursor to a more ambitious rover mission planned for 2020, and it's more of an engineering proof-of-concept than a science mission.

"We should remember this landing was a test," Ferri said on Wednesday. "And as part of the test, you want to learn what happened," he added, no matter the outcome.

The ESA said the orbiter seems to have safely entered into Mars orbit on Wednesday, which means its task of sniffing for methane on Mars - a potential sign of microbial life - can soon begin.

A harrowing descent

ESA

Prior to Schiaparelli, humanity tried 18 times to touch Mars with penetrators, landers, and wheeled rovers. Only eight such missions have ever succeeded.

Advertisement

The last time the ESA tried to land a probe on Mars, in 2003, it failed.

Its Beagle 2 lander successfully jettisoned from an orbiting spacecraft. Aside a final signal before its descent, however, the robot robot never contacted Earth again.

It wasn't until January 2015 - more than a decade later - that NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter found and photographed the dead rover in a satellite image. A subsequent investigation found that its solar panels had failed to deploy, so it never mustered the energy to phone home.

Artist's impression showing Schiaparelli separating from the Trace Gas Orbiter and heading for Mars. The lander is named for late 19th century Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli, who created a detailed telescopic map of Mars. The orbiter will sniff out potentially biological gases such as methane in Mars' atmosphere and track its sources and seasonal variations.ESA/D. Ducros

The 8-foot-wide Schiaparelli lander departed from its Martian gas-sniffing mother ship, TGO, the morning of October 16.

Its hair-raising descent to the surface of Mars should have taken less than 6 minutes because it initially traveled at 13,000 mph (21,000 kph).

Advertisement

To slow down, Schiaparelli first burned through a heat shield, deployed a parachute, and later cut the parachute and heat shield loose. After free-falling for awhile, it fired its thrusters.

From here on in the timeline, some kind of fault doomed the probe.

Schiaparelli was supposed to slow toward the surface until its sensors detected that it was hovering just a few feet from the ground.

At that point the thrusters should have stopped, dropping the probe with a thud onto a honeycomb-like pad that's designed to crumple and absorb the impact.

Had the probe survived, it would have also taken pictures of its descent and attempted to measure Mars' electric field for the first time, among other limited scientific observations.

Advertisement

May it rest in pieces.

NOW WATCH: Europe and Russia are about to make history by landing a spacecraft on Mars

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article