+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Ellen Pao lost most of her case, but jury was just sent back to deliberate on one claim

Mar 28, 2015, 02:37 IST

Ellen Pao has lost most of her discrimination case against former employer, venture firm Kleiner, Caufield, Perkins & Byers.

Advertisement

The jury said that Pao's gender was NOT a motivating reason for her not being promoted to general or senior partner. It was not a substantial reason for terminating her employment either, according to the jury.

However, the jury voted 8-4 against Pao on the claim that the firm retaliated against her for complaining about harassment and filing the lawsuit, which means the verdict is not final. At least 9 jurors had to vote against the claim for it to stick. The judge just sent the jury back to deliberate again on that last claim.

Here's a link to all the questions the jurors had to answer on each of the four claims.

Pao sued the firm for $16 million in 2012 for lost wages and other opportunity, claiming that the firm denied her promotions and other opportunities because she was a woman. The suit went to trial last month.

Advertisement

Over the last two weeks, Pao and her lawyers tried to paint a picture of a "men's club" workplace, pointing to incidents like an alleged conversation about the Playboy Mansion and porn stars on a business trip.

In her own testimony, she said she was suing the firm because "I wanted to make sure my story was told."

Kleiner's lawyers did everything they could to call Pao's testimony into question, and instead portrayed her as difficult to get along with and not particularly qualified for a promotion.

In closing arguments, Kleiner lawyer Lynne Hermle basically accused her of filing the suit only for the money, saying Pao "wanted a huge payout for Team Ellen."

Along the way, a lot of minute details of daily life at a VC firm were discussed, including the revelation that senior partners can make more than $1 million a year just in salary. There were also lots of discussions about a seating chart at an off-site meeting where Pao and another woman were asked to sit in back on one day, a ski trip where Pao wasn't invited, and the ins and outs of her consensual relationship with Ajit Nazre, a male partner who was fired in 2011 after an internal investigation found that he harassed another female partner, Trae Vassallo.

Advertisement

Apparently, the jury found Kleiner's version of events more compelling than Pao's.

Developing...refresh or click here for the latest.

NOW WATCH: How 'American Sniper' could affect the trial of Chris Kyle's alleged killer

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article