Apple wantsSamsung to pay the full damage amount of $1 billion.- The case revolves around what consists of an ‘article of manufacture’.
- Apple asserts that its the entire phone, while Samsung says the definition could be restricted to components.
The issue is essentially about two
The fourth episode of this case revolves around clarifying the definition of ‘article of manufacture’, that is whether the contents of the patents apply to the whole phone. While Apple says that it constitutes the entire phone, Samsung disagrees, asserting that it could be applied specifically to separate components within a phone.
The American tech giant’s lawyer argued in court that though the design aspects in question only address the iPhone at a cosmetic level, they are still key features of the Apple brand. His own words sight the design as ‘revolutionary’.
The original
This left $1 billion on the table. A new hearing was scheduled for November 2013, where the damages to Apple would be recalculated. Come December 2015, it was decided that Samsung would finally pay Apple $548 million.
Now, the argument boils down to an even smaller part of that payment. Apple is arguing that not only should Samsung pay the entire $399 million (which applies specifically to the two patents mentioned above) but the original $1 billion because ‘article of manufacture’ consists of the whole phone. On the other hand, Samsung only wants to provide a mere $28 million in reimbursements.