+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

CHART OF THE DAY: Crappy Decision-Making Is A Characteristic Shared By Investors Around The World

Mar 4, 2014, 23:51 IST

It's hard to keep count of all of the studies that show how humans make very poor, money-losing investment decisions.

Advertisement

In a new post for Credit Suisse's website, strategist Michael Mauboussin explains some of why this is so.

"One behavior of investors that is well documented is the tendency to buy after the market has risen and to sell following a drop," wrote Mauboussin.

He included this chart, which shows the results of this behavior.

"On average, investors earn 1.5 percentage points less per year than a buy-and-hold strategy as a result of the dumb money effect," noted Mauboussin. "So our minds encourage us to act at extremes and buy when the market is up and sell when the market is down."

Advertisement

Buy-and-hold returns (aka time-weighted returns) represent what happens when an investor just buys and holds. Asset-weighted returns capture investors buying when prices are high and selling when prices are low; a money losing exercise.

Mauboussin walks us through an example:

Here's a simple illustration. Let us say an investor buys 100 shares of a fund that starts a year with a net asset value of 10 US dollars, representing an outlay of 1,000 US dollars. In the next year, the fund's net asset value rises to 20 US dollars, doubling the investor's money. Excited, the investor buys an additional 100 shares, spending another 2,000 US dollars. In the second year, the net asset value of the fund declines to 10 US dollars, back where it started. How did the fund and our investor fare over the two years? The time-weighted return for the fund is zero, of course, as the fund ended at the same price as it started. But the asset weighted return for the investor is -27 percent , calculated as the internal rate of return based on the timing and magnitude of the investor's cash flows. The return would have been zero had our investor used a simple buy-and-hold strategy, and there would have been no nominal gain or loss. But in the scenario we outlined, our investor lost 1,000 US dollars of the 3,000 US dollars total investment because of the purchase after the fund rose.

"Because of investor behavior, returns for major indices substantially overstate the returns that investors actually earn," he wrote

"Investors can counterbalance this tendency by making predictions that place more weight on past results and less on recent outcomes."

Advertisement

Credit SuisseOddly, Canadians appear to have an advantage.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article