A federal court affirmed that Walmart should have paid California truck drivers during rest breaks - and the retail giant must pay drivers $55 million
- Walmart truck drivers are the latest to win in federal court for unpaid rest breaks.
- The Ninth Circuit, a federal court of appeals, just affirmed that Walmart will need to pay its California truck drivers $54.6 million.
- Walmart truckers are among the best paid in the business, a spokesperson told Business Insider. The retail giant said it would "explore our options" to challenge the opinion.
- It's the latest legal move that suggests truck drivers should be paid for rest breaks. Meanwhile, the federal agency that oversees truck drivers has ruled that rest breaks should not be paid.
- Sign up for Business Insider's transportation newsletter, Shifting Gears, to get more stories like this in your inbox.
- Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
Walmart truck drivers in California are getting a serious payday.
On January 6, a three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a $54.6 million jury win for Walmart's truck drivers in California.
The retail giant is also a trucking giant; it maintains its own private fleet of 9,000 truck drivers. These truck drivers are also famously well-compensated; the median salary for Walmart truckers is around double that of the national median.
Still, the Ninth Circuit, which is based in San Francisco and oversees much of the Western US, says Walmart violated the law when it didn't pay truck drivers for rest breaks.
America's 1.8 million long-haul truck drivers spend weeks away from home - sleeping, eating, and working in their trucks. They're legally capped at working 70 hours for an eight-day period, but rarely receive overtime.
Nationwide, truckers are required to take a 30-minute break during their workday and not drive for more than 11 hours in a day. But that rest time isn't usually paid - because truckers are usually paid per mile, not per hour.
Increasingly, federal judges are saying that violates labor law. In January 2019, a federal judge in Arkansas affirmed that trucking giant PAM Transport violated federal labor laws when it didn't pay its 3,000 truck-driver employees at least minimum wage for every nonsleeping hour spent in their truck.
Walmart says it stands by its pay practices, and will consider appealing the Ninth Circuit opinion.
"We continue to believe that our truck drivers are paid in compliance with California law and often in excess of what California law requires," a Walmart spokesperson said in a statement to Business Insider."We are proud that our drivers are among the best paid in the industry, earning, on average, between $80,000 to over $100,000 per year. We are reviewing the 9th Circuit's opinion and will explore our options."
The courts and federal lawmakers are butting heads when it comes to paying truck drivers for rest breaks
The Ninth Circuit opinion also points to other recent court cases in favor of truck drivers securing pay for every hour they spend on the road. In 2017, a Nebraska court decided that trucking giant Werner Enterprises must pay out a total of $780,000 to 52,000 student truck drivers after the company was accused of pay practice violations. Another major carrier, C.R. England, paid $2.35 million in back wages to more than 6,000 drivers in 2016.
Meanwhile, federal regulators are revising court decisions that would pay truck drivers more.
In December 2018, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) said that California trucking companies don't need to provide paid rest and meal breaks for truck driver employees who drive in and outside of California.
The agency alleged that rest breaks have upped the accident rates along the California-Oregon border, because those drivers cannot find parking. It also said rest breaks are bad for the economy.
"California's extra rules reduce productivity and are a drag on the economy," then-FMSCA Administrator Ray Martinez said. "Every bit of loss productivity increases costs to consumers and hurts hard-working American families."
