+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Barack Obama's Plan To Save The Internet Is Perfect

Nov 12, 2014, 22:03 IST

This week, President Obama came out in favor of net neutrality, the idea that all content on the internet should flow freely and equally without any intervention from service providers.

Advertisement

Specifically, Obama wants to categorize the internet under something called Title II, which would classify the internet as a utility, just like telephone lines.

This scares the pants off internet service providers (ISPs) like Comcast, Time Warner, Verizon, AT&T, etc. All of these companies have come out in favor of "the open internet," but their definition of "open" is much different than what net neutrality purists want.

The fear is that unless ISPs are categorized under Title II, there could be a chilling effect on innovation when someone wants to create the next major internet company like Netflix, YouTube, or, say, Business Insider. ISPs could slow down content from the new companies in favor of their own content.

ISPs swear they don't want to slow down rival content. And they're probably telling the truth. But under one proposal the FCC is considering, ISPs won't be able to slow down traffic, but they will be able to make their own web content get to you faster, giving them an advantage. So while ISPs and the FCC says all content on the internet will be equal, the reality is that some content will be more equal than the rest.

Advertisement

Critics say Obama's proposal will stifle innovation because it will keep service costs low and slow down their ability to invest more in infrastructure.

But the problem with that argument their investment in building out broadband networks is already slowing, as Matthew Yglesias of Vox pointed out this spring. Telecom companies invested $17.65 billion in broadband between 2005 and 2008. But that investment fell to $12.24 billion between 2009 and 2013. Meanwhile, the cost of internet access continues to go up. Americans also get slower speeds for what they pay compared to other countries, according to the Open Technology Institute.

It's also worth noting that FCC chairman Tom Wheeler is a former telecom lobbyist, representing big all the big ISPs. That makes it tough to trust his proposals are in the public's interest, not the ISPs' interest.

That's why Obama is right. ISPs have done nothing to prove that internet access won't get more expensive over time. They've also done nothing to guarantee they won't start favoring their own services over rivals. As the proposals stand now, there's still wiggle room for ISPs favor some content over others.

Obama's Title II proposal is the only approach that guarantees the internet will be a level playing field for everyone. He put it best in his statement Monday:

Advertisement

For almost a century, our law has recognized that companies who connect you to the world have special obligations not to exploit the monopoly they enjoy over access in and out of your home or business. That is why a phone call from a customer of one phone company can reliably reach a customer of a different one, and why you will not be penalized solely for calling someone who is using another provider. It is common sense that the same philosophy should guide any service that is based on the transmission of information - whether a phone call, or a packet of data.

In other words, the internet has become as vital to commerce and communications as phone lines were decades ago. Giving companies that have only demonstrated they want to profit off that communication without making investing in making it better and more affordable is a dangerous path.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article