+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

BABY BOOMERS: Yeah, We're Leaving The Labor Force Alright - Because We Can't Get Back In It

Sep 24, 2013, 22:30 IST

REUTERS/David McNew Baby Boomers march in an Occupy Los Angeles protest in 2011.Getting old is hard.

Advertisement

Getting old and getting shut out of the workforce is misery.

Since the recession, the labor force participation rate - the percent of the population employed or looking for work - has remained stubbornly low.

Many analysts have attributed much of this to America's aging population.

And that may be true.

Advertisement

But what the numbers can't show is that some boomers are dropping out because they can't get re-hired if they've been left jobless.

In 2006, Connecticut resident Valerie Comeau was laid off from her job at a major insurer.

She spent the next seven years in and out of work before giving up entirely this year and taking early social security at the age of 62.

"I am beyond frustration at this point regarding employment, so I just decided to pack it in," she told us via email.

She says she is fairly certain that in one instance an employer wouldn't take her on because she was too old to train.

Advertisement

At another gig she applied to, she says, the hiring manager told her 800 applicants had also sent resumes.

"There just are not enough jobs in this area for the number of people unemployed who are looking for work."

Analysts also like to point out that demographics actually began to drag the labor force participation rate prior to the recession.

But according to Ronni Bennett, so did age discrimination.

A retired news producer and web editor who now writes a blog on aging, Bennett, then 63, was let go from her position overseeing one of the earliest incarnations of a major consulting firm's website in 2004.

Advertisement

She spent the next year looking for a new gig, but only got two call backs.

"They thought I was hot stuff, they'd say 'Hurry up, can you be there at 10 tomorrow,' " she said. "Then I would show up and they'd say the job had been filled when they saw me."

As layoffs soared in the midst of the recession, so did workplace discrimination suits.

But the spike in age discrimination cases was one of the most acute:

Equal Opportunity Employment Commission

Advertisement

It's a particularly unfair situation, Bennett said, given climbing lifespans should be extending the definition of prime earnings years.

And she rejected the notion that she should have simply gone back to school.

"Nobody who says that knows what they're talking about," she said. "[Maybe] if you're an administrative assistant working for somebody who only gave you typewriter to maybe learn computer."

She ended up losing 35% of her savings in the wake of Lehman, and was forced to take out a reverse mortgage to give her an adequate financial cushion.

Researchers at the Urban Institute have confirmed that the lack of entry (or reentry) into the workforce is having a greater impact on the labor force participation rate than the rate of people leaving it.

Advertisement

The rate of 55-66 year-olds entering or reentering the work force between 2010 and 2011 dropped 17 points compared with the rate following the 2001 recession:

Urban.org

Meanwhile, the rate of 55-66 year-olds leaving the workforce post-Lehman was actually found to be slower than post-2001:

Urban.org

This puts huge pressure on personal finances, Urban explains:

Advertisement

"The reluctance of older workers to reenter the labor market in recent years...is troubling, as they may be increasingly likely to remain permanently out of the workforce, potentially compromising their retirement security."

Even boomers facing negligible financial pressure have been forced into retirement.

A Massachusetts man we spoke with who wished to be identified as "Ted" said he had enough savings to comfortably hang up his nursing career in his '50s.

But he didn't plan to actually stop working until 65.

He ended up not having a choice in the matter, he says, after he was let go from a part-time gig. He's convinced it was because he was one of the oldest workers there.

Advertisement

"The CEO of company said we need to clean house - and everybody who left was my age."

Despite getting shut out of the formal workforce, at least some of this cohort is still working.

Ted now serves on the board of his son's startup firm.

And between her blog and local volunteering gigs, Bennett said she is now actually working more hours than she ever did than when she was in the labor force.

But it seems clear that, whether by choice or necessity, employers have left them behind.

Advertisement
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article