+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Author of explosive New York Times profile: Ben Rhodes is 'the bravest person I've ever met in Washington'

May 14, 2016, 01:23 IST

Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes looks up from his cell phone before continuing a television interview with CNN in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, April 7, 2015.AP

The author of a New York Times Magazine profile on Barack Obama's deputy national-security adviser, Ben Rhodes, wrote a lengthy rebuttal on Friday to critics who have accused him of biased reporting because of his alleged opposition to the Iran nuclear deal.

Advertisement

The interview, published on May 5, received widespread attention for its unusually honest tone and Rhodes' willingness to share details about the meticulous foreign-policy narrative he has helped Obama construct -particularly, how Rhodes says he helped Obama sell the Iran deal.

But many critics have accused the author, David Samuels, of exaggerating or misrepresenting facts to make the White House's communications strategy sound more deceitful than it was in order to discredit the deal. They allege that Samuels has criticized the deal in the past - in a Slate article and at a panel discussion for the Hudson Institute last April.

In The New York Times, Samuels shot down the accusation as a "hot take" and a "fever-dream caricature, one that willfully ignores and obliterates the many hundreds of thousands of words I have written during my 20 years as a reporter."

Pointing to his work on nuclear weapons and the extensive conversations he's had with experts and administration officials, Samuels said that "on balance, I suppose I do" support the Iran deal.

Advertisement

He wrote:

It's a complicated agreement and I'm not an expert (I'm a journalist), but after talking to people who are experts - including Leon Panetta, who told me that he supports the deal with reservations - I imagine it's probably a good-enough idea that I should have some reservations about, too.

Screenshot/Hudson InstituteDavid Samuels at the Hudson Institute event "What's Wrong with the Proposed Nuclear Deal with Iran?"

He also noted that the White House officials he spoke to for the Rhodes profile were "candid and factual" when pressed about the mechanisms they used to sell the deal. Rhodes wanted Samuels to understand "the machinery he managed so brilliantly" because that machinery would soon be in the hands of another, potentially more dangerous, administration, Samuels wrote.

Additional controversy erupted over Samuels' decision to name two of the journalists administration officials and other reporters evidently "suggested" were handpicked Beltway insiders who often helped the White House spread its message: The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg and Al-Monitor's Laura Rozen.

Advertisement

Samuels defended that characterization as "fair," and noted that mentioning their names was an important part of portraying how Rhodes - who is already "deeply critical of the press" - does his job.

Samuels said he and his editors at The New York Times stand behind "every single word" he wrote, and that he is actually really fond of Rhodes, whom he called "the bravest person I've ever met in Washington."

"If it sounds weird to say that Rhodes is both a manipulative spin-doctor and a deeply honest, creative person who believes strongly in the policies he spins for, well, that is still the truth," he said.

Read the full article at The New York Times Magazine >>

NOW WATCH: Jon Stewart broke his silence to call out 'man-baby' Trump and the media's 'corrupt' investment in his rise

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article