+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

Are Missing Numbers From California Behind The Drop In Jobless Claims Again!?

Jan 24, 2013, 22:34 IST

Earlier this morning, we learned that weekly initial jobless claims fell to a 5-year low of 330k. This was much lower than the 355k economists were expecting.

Advertisement

So, is this reason to cheer?

According to a research firm cited by the Wall Street Journal's Vincent Cignarella, this week's number may be skewed.

...a small San Francisco research firm suggests it has more to do with the fact that California, whose 38 million population gives it the biggest workforce in the nation, hasn’t filed its claims numbers for past two weeks.

That meant the state’s bean counters had to come up with a guesstimate — and by Southbay Research’s reckoning, they may have come up with too low a number.

Advertisement

Cignarella reports that a Labor Department analyst confirmed that California and Virginia provided estimates for the latest report. That same analyst noted the Labor Department had to make its own estimate for Hawaii after the state didn't provide data.

Last October, a surprise drop in jobless claims had many people chattering about a data conspiracy. At the time, a Labor Department analyst explained to Business Insider that the report may have excluded claims that weren't processed in time for the release. The big state in question was California.

But this doesn't mean that underestimation means those claims just disappear for good. Rather, those claims should appear in a latter claims report. In other words, if this week was underestimated, then last week's number should see a jump.

Read more at WSJ.com.

You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article