+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

A judge may overturn a bond trader's fraud conviction because 'big boys' in the market should expect 'puffery'

May 14, 2015, 19:41 IST

Jesse Litvak, a former Jefferies bond trader convicted of lying about mortgage-backed bonds in connection with the post-crisis Troubled Asset Relief Program, may now get off the hook.

Advertisement

That's because the appeals judge said a "certain amount of license and puffery" is expected of traders, and it's no worse than the embellishments of a car salesman, reports Bloomberg.

The judge also argued that Litvak was playing with the "big boys" who should've been able to take care of themselves in the market.

In March 2014, Litvak was convicted of fraud for lying to bond buyers and sellers, telling them that other parties were setting higher (or lower) prices on the other side of the trade.

He also made up a non-existent seller when negotiating with a buyer in order to charge a fake match-making commission, according to the U.S. attorney's office.

Advertisement

"By misrepresenting the true terms of trades, Litvak manipulated victims' prices and made trades less profitable for them, but more profitable for Jefferies," prosecutor Jonathan N. Francis argued.

The defense agreed that Litvak had lied, saying it's "undisputed" that he "made misstatements," but said the specific things he lied about shouldn't have had a material impact on any trading negotiations.

Also, defense attorneys said, there was publicly available data on all of this stuff, so traders shouldn't have relied on Litvak's word alone.

That's fair, right?

NOW WATCH: How Forensic Accountants Use Benford's Law To Detect Fraud

Please enable Javascript to watch this video
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article