A former employee says Google's smart contact lens is 'slideware' that exists only in PowerPoint presentations
The glucose-sensing smart contact lens that Google first announced in 2014 is still just "slideware" that doesn't exist outside of PowerPoint presentations, according to a former Verily manager who spoke to Stat's Charles Piller as part of a critical look at the company's current endeavors.
The contact lens project aims to provide an alternative for people with diabetes who currently have to prick their fingers to test their blood glucose levels. Instead, the lens could monitor the glucose levels in their tears.
But the Stat report questions whether the lens will ever be scientifically feasible. Pillar reports that the company's prototype didn't work and that previous attempts from other companies to make similar products have all failed for the same reason: tears can't accurately reflect bodily glucose levels.
"Faith-based science"
Verily disputes that the correlation between tear and blood glucose levels has been concretely proven as inaccurate and adds that its lenses are trying to improve upon a tear-collection method that may have skewed earlier research. But chemist John Smith tells Stat that he's skeptical.
"(T)here is always a new adherent who thinks all the measurements that went before were wrong," Smith is quoted as saying in the report. "This kind of 'faith-based science' has proven to be very expensive, and should not come from companies like Verily; but then, cost does not seem to be an issue there."
The lens project actually spurred the creation of Verily as an independent Alphabet subsidiary company and healthcare company Novartis partnered with the team in summer 2014 to develop and commercialize the product.
But those efforts are still in the research phase, Novartis tells Stat.
Without mentioning the Stat report, Verily's chief medical officer, Jessica Mega, went on Bloomberg TV Monday afternoon to talk about its projects and pointed out that Verily " is not a products company, but it's a company really focused on trying to shift the needle when it comes to health and disease."
Stat compares the hype around Verily to that of troubled blood testing company, Theranos, and when Bloomberg host Emily Chang asked Mega about tempering public expectation, she said that the key is to "work towards transparency."
Verily wasn't immediately available for comment.
The Stat report also takes a critical look at some of Verily's other efforts, like its cancer-detecting magnetic nanoparticles and its health study, Baseline. Read the full report here.