Thomson Reuters
Robert Mueller.
- A court has decided to release documents related to independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation into former President Bill Clinton that eventually led to Clinton's impeachment.
- That investigation was similar to the special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation several ways.
- It may provide clues for Mueller on how to get President Donald Trump to testify under oath.
- Trump's lawyers though have been stonewalling Mueller - and negotiations between the two legal teams might take up to six months.
A federal court in Washington, DC, will unseal a trove of documents related to independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation into former President Bill Clinton that eventually led to his 1999 impeachment, CNN reported.
The documents, which had remained sealed for almost 20 years, will likely shed light on how Starr was able to get Clinton to testify in his investigation after six months of negotiating with his legal team.
Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and whether President Donald Trump obstructed justice in the probe, has found himself increasingly stonewalled by White House lawyers in his bid to get testimony from Trump.
Starr and Mueller's investigations are similar in that they both issued grand jury subpoenas to witnesses and were led by an independent investigator. Although Mueller had hoped to sit down with Trump within the first few months of 2018, if Starr's precedent is any indication, Mueller will need to endure months of back-and-forth negotiations, potentially resulting in a showdown at the Supreme Court.
The documents the DC court is set to unseal are related to eight different cases in which individuals were handed subpoenas requiring them to testify. Individuals mentioned in the cases will have a chance to voice any concerns about the documents' release, according to CNN.
Trump's counteroffensive also relies on a Clinton-related probe
Trump's legal team is reportedly also hoping to use a Clinton-related investigation from the 1990s as a model for how to avoid an interview with Mueller.
Business Insider has reported that Trump's team is using a 1994 investigation by an independent counsel into a Clinton administration official as a roadmap to limit the scope of questioning in the event that the president will eventually be forced to testify.
But Lanny Davis, a former special counsel, said Trump might be running out of options.
"No matter how much huffing and puffing Trump's lawyers do, they cannot escape a grand-jury-issued subpoena," Davis said.
But Trump's current strategy is much different from the one he initially articulated in January before reporters.
"I am looking forward to it, actually," Trump said, when asked if he would be willing to sit down with Mueller. "Here is the story: There has been no collusion whatsoever. There is no obstruction whatsoever. And I am looking forward to it."
Trump's lawyers quickly walked back that statement, saying they would ultimately decide whether he would talk with Mueller.