On April 2, PUBG Corp. filed a lawsuit in a California court against Chinese game publisher NetEase, over allegations of copyright infringement. The suit, discovered by TorrentFreak, seeks a relatively small amount in financial damages — just $150,000 "per infringed work."
The aim of the suit is to stop NetEase from selling its "Battle Royale" games altogether: "To remove each and every version of the games 'Rules of Survival,' 'Knives Out,' and similarly infringing games, from distribution and to cease developing and supporting those games," the suit says.
It's the strongest move yet from the folks behind "PUBG" to defend their work, and it makes sense. "Knives Out" alone has 25 million downloads, with $50 million in revenue, according to SensorTower data provided to Business Insider. And that doesn't include China.
The question at the heart of the lawsuit is whether it's possible to infringe on a video game copyright. How different does a game have to be from "PUBG" to be considered legally different?
Playing "Knives Out," it's immediately clear that it's very similar to "PUBG" — but it's also clearly not exactly the same game.
In the case of "Rules of Survival," the comparison is a bit more dramatic. Look at this image from the lawsuit document — "Rules of Survival" is on the left, "PUBG" is on the right:
PUBG Corp. is also claiming that NetEase intentionally misled consumers into believing that its games were related to "PUBG."