+

Cookies on the Business Insider India website

Business Insider India has updated its Privacy and Cookie policy. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the better experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we\'ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the Business Insider India website. However, you can change your cookie setting at any time by clicking on our Cookie Policy at any time. You can also see our Privacy Policy.

Close
HomeQuizzoneWhatsappShare Flash Reads
 

70-Year-Old Court Employee Fired After Helping A Wrongly Convicted Man Seek DNA Tests

Jul 29, 2013, 23:11 IST

KSHB News/ScreenshotA Kansas judge fired a 34-year employee of the court — nine months before her retirement — after she showed a wrongly convicted man a publicly available court document on DNA testing, the Associated Press reported.

Advertisement

Robert Nelson, 49, used the information from Sharon Snyder, 70, to prove he didn't commit a rape that would have kept him behind bars for 70 years.

Nelson filed a motion in 2009 requesting DNA testing not available when the court convicted him 25 years earlier in 1983. Jackson County judge David Byrn, the same one who put him in prison, twice denied his request.

At that point, Nelson's sister got in touch with Snyder. The great-grandmother provided Nelson with a case where a judge sustained a motion for retrospective DNA testing.

With this new information Nelson tried a third time, and Byrn granted his motion and appointed a lawyer from the Innocence Project to represent him. Last month, the Kansas City police department's crime lab excluded Nelson as a source for the evidence found in the case.

Advertisement

Nelson calls Snyder his "angel," the AP reported.

In his letter dismissing Snyder, the judge said she'd crossed a line by giving advice to a defendant.

“The document you chose was, in effect, your recommendation for a Motion for DNA testing that would likely be successful in this Division,” according to the letter quoted by the AP. “But it was clearly improper and a violation of Canon Seven … which warns against the risk of offering an opinion or suggested course of action.”


Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2013/07/28/4373583/jackson-county-circuit-judge-fires.html#storylink=cpy
You are subscribed to notifications!
Looks like you've blocked notifications!
Next Article