Best printers for Home

Best Mixer Grinder

Best wired Earphones

Best 43 Inch TV in India

Best Wi Fi Routers

Best Home Theatre in India

Smart Watch under 5000

Best Laptops for Education

Best Laptop for Students

<keyword id="20115473" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Ashneer-Grover" source="keywords">Ashneer Grover</keyword>, known for his blunt persona on the Indian edition of Shark Tank, has once again found himself embroiled in a controversy, this time involving a popular comedy roast. The co-founder and former managing director of <keyword id="19956322" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="BharatPe" source="keywords" meta.keywordsubtype="org" meta.entityname="BharatPe" meta.hostid="261" meta.entityid="BharatPe">BharatPe</keyword>, Grover is no stranger to the limelight, but his latest escapade has stirred considerable buzz of the negative kind on social media. Grover recently featured on "<keyword id="21736600" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Pretty-Good-Roast" source="keywords">Pretty Good Roast</keyword>," a show hosted by comedian <keyword id="21736601" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Aashish-Solanki" source="keywords">Aashish Solanki</keyword>. During the episode, Solanki made light of Grover's tumultuous exit from BharatPe — a topic that has been a hot-button issue ever since Grover and his wife were ousted from the fintech startup in 2022 amid allegations of financial impropriety. The roast, which included jabs at Grover’s departure from his own company, quickly became a viral sensation. However, the humour did not sit well with Grover. He reportedly demanded the removal of the segments featuring these jokes and subsequently sent Solanki a <keyword id="20476156" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="legal-notice" source="keywords">legal notice</keyword> to take down the entire episode. Solanki complied, announcing on Instagram: "Friends, I have removed the Ep 5 of Pretty Good Roast. I don't have money to fight the legal battle. I had spent all of it on the show," he stated, highlighting the financial strain legal actions can impose on independent creators. Solanki also expressed his disappointment, noting, "The response on previous episodes led us to believe our audience were ready for roast humour. However, it seems that some, especially those in power, are not quite there yet." This incident has triggered a wave of backlash against Grover, with many accusing him of "<keyword id="20415529" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="doglapan" source="keywords">doglapan</keyword>" (duplicity). The term gained popularity during Grover’s stint on <keyword id="19913228" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank-india" source="keywords">Shark Tank India</keyword> and even became the title of his book, "Doglapan: The Hard Truth about Life and Start-Ups." Social media users were quick to point out the irony of Grover, who once prided himself on his no-holds-barred attitude, now seeking to censor comedic content. <div type="twitter" handle="samratsingh23" handlename="samratsingh23" favoritecount="0" retweetcount="0" id="1792498229701161312"></div> <div type="twitter" handle="memes_hallabol" handlename="memes_hallabol" favoritecount="0" retweetcount="0" id="1792750542655295852"></div> The controversy draws attention to Grover's complex public persona. After his high-profile exit from BharatPe, Grover pivoted to content creation, leveraging his fame to build a substantial following on platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and various podcasts. He has even claimed that he has made more money through content creation than during his tenure at BharatPe. Despite his success as a content creator, Grover’s latest actions have sparked a debate about the boundaries of humour and criticism, especially concerning public figures. The legal threat against Solanki underscores the precarious balance comedians must navigate when their satire targets influential individuals. As the dust settles, one thing is clear: Ashneer Grover remains a polarising figure. His journey from a controversial entrepreneur to a content creator and now to a central figure in a comedy roast controversy reflects the multifaceted and often contentious nature of public life.

Roasted shark? Ashneer Grover faces backlash over legal tussle with comedian Aashish Solanki

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Daniel Lubetzky, founder of snack brand Kind, is joining "<a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/shark-tank-kevin-oleary-marriage-family-children-kids-wealth-advice-2024-9">Shark Tank"</a> as the show's newest Shark.</li><li>Lubetzky will take a permanent seat on the show after five seasons as a guest.</li></ul><a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/kind-founder-how-build-culture-empathy-stay-competitive-2021-5">Daniel Lubetzky</a> has seen dozens of pitches from founders on the ABC television series "Shark Tank."But Lubetzky will be hearing even more <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/top-tips-startup-pitches-according-vc-general-partner-2023-2">pitches</a> as he becomes the show's latest new judge — or "Shark" — starting with the show's new season next month.Lubetzky isn't a stranger to Shark Tank or startups. He's spent five seasons as a "Guest Shark" on the show.He also founded snack maker Kind in 2004. The brand became known for its snack bars and was acquired by Mars, the company that owns Snickers candy bars and Juicy Fruit chewing gum, in 2020. The deal reportedly <a target="_blank" class="" href="https://www.businessinsider.com/mars-wrigley-buys-kind-north-america-valued-around-5-billion-2020-11">valued Kind at $5 billion.</a>In an interview with Business Insider, Lubetzky pointed to a quality he looks for in the founders pitching him on Shark Tank.Founders often pitch with everything that's going well with their business, Lubetzky said. But he also looks for frank assessments of what they're struggling with, he added.The founders of one of Lubetzky's investments, an arepa brand called Toast It, provided an example when they appeared on a Shark Tank episode that aired last year. Sisters Coco and Mafe Cabezas said they came to the US from Venezuela and founded the food brand in their spare time.It was clear that they had "an enormous amount of passion," Lubetzky told BI. But during the episode, Lubetzky and the other Sharks asked the Cabezas about their plans to improve their company's margins.Coco and Mafe acknowledged the challenge of making food products profitable. They also pointed to their efforts to cut packaging costs and plans to save money on ingredients."When I asked them tough questions and they had some areas where they were not perfect, they said, 'Yeah, this is our area of opportunity,'" Lubetzky told BI. He ended up striking a deal with the sisters, paying $150,000 for a 20% stake in Toast It.Acknowledging shortcomings like that shows introspection, he said."And for me, that's one of the greatest values, not just for an entrepreneur, but for human beings," Lubetzky said. "If you can criticize yourself and evaluate what you're not doing, you can get better."Season 16 of Shark Tank will premiere on ABC on October 16 at 8 p.m. ET.

Founders should do this surprising thing more often in pitches, Daniel Lubetzky, the newest 'Shark Tank' addition, says

<ul><li>The <keyword id="11924074" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank-india" source="Orion">Shark Tank India</keyword> judge says gatekeepers of the app ecosystem – Apple and <keyword id="19902762" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="google" source="keywords">Google</keyword> – are the new East India Company and they operate with complete arrogance and impunity.</li><li>Just as startup founders are coming under pressure, venture capitalists and auditors too need to be held accountable for their behaviour.</li><li><keyword id="20225195" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank" source="keywords">Shark Tank</keyword> India has become a catalyst for driving entrepreneurship and giving it legitimacy. </li></ul> <keyword id="127971" type="General" weightage="100" keywordseo="anupam-mittal" source="Orion">Anupam Mittal</keyword> is India’s original internet entrepreneur, who is the founder and CEO of People Group. Way before platform economy became a buzzword, Mittal built a platform for Indians seeking life partners. And even today one million Indians find their partners on shaadi.com every year. Call him the OG of startups or a serial entrepreneur, he is a man who does not mince words. In a free wheeling chat with Business Insider’s Malini Bhupta, Mittal talks about unfair trade practices of Google, his investment in Ola’s Bhavish Aggarwal and what he thinks is the biggest achievement of Shark Tank India. Edited Excerpts: With some high profile startups like Paytm and Byju’s coming under lens, what do you think is wrong with the startup ecosystem? I think the Paytm issue is a little different. There are two issues there in my view – one is valuation. The company came out with its IPO at the height of the unicorn boom and as a result, their valuation was corrected when the pvt. market corrected. This is part of the pricing game and one can hardly blame them for it. Eventually, they would have grown into their valuation is what I believe. However, the second issue which is regulatory in nature is far more serious. Whether it is justified or not I don’t know. I think there is a little heavy-handedness here as what you are talking about is a payments bank KYC stuff being the reason to shut them down, which could be seen as over-reach since they are not a significantly important lending institution. Talking about what is wrong with India’s ecosystem and why founders are behaving badly is a common issue that occurs when there are high levels of greed. When there is massive liquidity in the system people think they can take advantage of the situation. In the US you have seen Theranos, crypto frauds and an industry that was created around SPACs. Billions of dollars have been lost on that. What is happening in India is a small reflection of that. Greed manifests in two ways – one is the founders who are ambitious who see the ecosystem celebrating unicorns and that gets weaponised. Over time a few start with minor refractions and very soon they start fabricating revenues and manipulating auditors to keep up with the image that has been created. They are riding tigers they can't get off. The venture capitalists too want to see their investments being marked up as their future fund raises depend on the portfolio's net asset value and so they play along and at times actually drive the founders at a velocity that is unsustainable. I think they need to be held accountable by their LPs. Auditors have a very important role here and are perhaps the ones who need to pay the highest price through government censures. They are market participants who have been entrusted with a certain job for which they get paid hefty fees. When they start looking the other way, the system breaks. You have been waging a pitched battle against the unfair trade practices of Big Tech companies in India. What, in your view, are the steps that need to be taken by the government to prevent such unfair practices by large global players? Fundamentally the experience of the internet is through apps – two companies control the entire app ecosystem Google and Apple. Both operate with complete impunity. Two years ago the CCI passed an order against Google around <keyword id="963171" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="google-play" source="Orion">Google Play</keyword> Billing System (GPBS). Now they have changed the name to User Choice Billing. If you look at the order CCI says there will be no discrimination at all. Being on the App Store means nothing unless you advertise on Play Store. Startups spend anywhere between 10-50% of revenue on advertising on these platforms already. Essentially, the app store is worth nothing if you don’t have content. What choice does a company have but to adhere to their unfair practices… Now they say that any transaction that happens on apps downloaded via the store will be subject to 15-30% tax/commissions. What this means is that they want 50% of the revenues of the startups. It is the new East India Company and they operate with complete arrogance and impunity. The problem is in getting these companies to comply. Their strategy is to stretch out the legal process and tire the system. Our government and regulators have the right intent but sometimes democracies are messy. As a government, we have to ensure that nobody becomes the gatekeeper to our economy which is what these companies are trying to do. There should be penal provisions for anybody who abuses the law or twists and turns it while violating the very spirit of it. Non-compliance with judicial orders is contempt of court and so there is an opportunity to send a very strong message. These bullies need one arm chopped off in the form of penalties, a rap on the knuckles will not work as they are too big to care about a couple of hundred million in penalties. What is the biggest achievement of Shark Tank, which has now become a huge hit in India? In life timing is everything. Shark Tank’s first season was in December 2021, which was the peak of the startup hype cycle, and it demystified the whole conversation around startups and funding. Shark Tank has become a catalyst for driving entrepreneurship and giving it legitimacy. India is a land of entrepreneurs with every second person running some small business, many from home. A decade ago, if you told someone you are an entrepreneur, you would be told to come back when you get serious. The show has played an amazing role in celebrating entrepreneurship and the startup ecosystem. A lot of companies have done very well. About 8-10 companies that got funded in Shark Tank are doing very well out of 180 companies that came to the show. This is an early stage game and will play out the same way. When you invest in 100 early stage companies, 4-5 will do very well and help recover the investments and some will become very big. A majority will fail. What I found amazing was that the companies that came to the show were not the elites who came from IIT or IIM. These are small businesses founded by housewives and family members. Entrepreneurship is not the reserve of the few. The next decade will be defined by Indian entrepreneurs globally and so there is no better time to be an entrepreneur than now. Shark Tank has put belief in every Indian that they can do it and that changes the game. Many of the founders that come to Shark Tank can do even better than the founders who have come from an IIT or an IIM. I believe that these people understand commerce and ‘dhandha’. The elitist founders are used to being served everything on a platter. Many professionals who come out of large companies or consulting firms cannot start without large funding. Out of the 100 unicorns we have, many will spectacularly fail in 2024 as they were built on the wrong foundations. These companies were built on a template of Ivy League founders and old school networks and so they got funded. Of the businesses that come to Shark Tank, what sectors can do well and stand a better chance of being funded? Indians now have the same aspirations as people in other parts of the world. Anybody who comes in and can bridge the gap between aspiration and affordability will do well especially in lifestyle. For example - Companies in the clothing and jewellery space will do well if they can deliver high aspiration at a value pricing. Last year a company called Snitch came with a revenue of Rs 60 crore and is now doing Rs 250 crore in sales. A company called Skippy, which makes ice pops was funded on Shark Tank too and has a run rate of Rs 50 crore from a few lakhs before ST. I funded a company called Sharmaji Ka Atta which has a revenue run rate of Rs 20 lakh a month in less than 12 months from less than 1 lakh. Another one called Whatsapp Wellness just got funded by HUL. Fundamentally, companies that can build premium products but don’t break the bank on affordability in categories like fashion, lifestyle and food will do well. People read labels now and the young generation is focused on what they are eating. Beauty and wellness products will do well as a secular trend for most of our history Lakme meant beauty, that’s how unbranded we were. Do you feel Shaadi.com is still relevant after Tinder and other dating apps came about? Let’s understand why Tinder is used, it is for hookups and is struggling to grow its revenue in India. Shaadi.com is not an arranged marriage platform. Shaadi.com is a planned marriage platform. Indian culture has four stages of life and marriage is one of the life stages. When you are planning to marry you look for compatibility and it is not about a chemical reaction. On Shaadi.com the family and parents collaborate to find a partner. The old community networks are now dying and we replace those networks. We are bringing together people in the same life stage to find a like-minded partner. The hook-up sites don’t do that and don't understand the Indian ethos. They are applying the same global model to India which does not work beyond a certain point. You were the original internet entrepreneur with a disruptive product. Why did you not create a large business that went on to become a decacorn or a unicorn? It depends on how you define success. If the definition is labels such as decacorn and unicorn, then that's not the game we are playing. Those are vanity labels that I would rather not pursue. Our definition of success is value creation and we are long-term compounders, much like Berkshire &amp; LVMH, so in a sense our ‘overnight’ success story is still waiting to become obvious to the world. From that lens, our ROCE is perhaps the best in the industry we have only ever raised about $20 mn but created several billion in value between our operated and invested cos. Our investee companies employ thousands, have raised over $20 bn and will go on to create $100 bn in value over time, in the bargain generating tremendous wealth for the country and hopefully for us too. We boast an IRR of 52% consistently for more than a decade which is extraordinary by any standards and a testament to our approach and story. Many people build businesses but we were fortunate to create entire industries such as online matchmaking via Shaadi.com, which we still run; proptech company Makaan.com which we sold to NewsCorp very handsomely; India’s first &amp; still the largest digital ad agency, Interactive Avenues, which we sold to IPG at a benchmark price that is yet to be crossed; India’s first mobile gaming company, Mauj Mobile which spawned a massive industry. So, whether it is our customers, employees, shareholders, the country or society at large, I think we have already impacted 10s of millions and while we don’t have a market listed entity like Jio or TCS to show for it, we have delivered massive national and global level impact. Keep in mind that we are most often the first to check into investee cost and every company we have founded has been the first in its industry. Our innovations have generated billions of dollars in wealth and given rise to innumerable founders and entrepreneurs who have learnt at our companies and gone on to build massive companies of their own. Further, I am still very young and the Indian opportunity is only now unfolding. In the next couple of years, you will see some of our other bets in space exploration, mobility real edtech, &amp; sustainable fintech come into the limelight besides something very special we are building on our own. So, in short, I still remain the OG and if you force me to use your labels we have birthed not one or two but several Unicorns &amp; Decacorns and that too with very limited capital. It is perhaps one of the most spectacular untold stories of value creation in the digital economy. Ola is one company that is headed for an IPO and you own 2% in the company. How did that happen? When we invested in Ola, there was not much of a concept of venture funding and the company did not have any suitors so we were able to get in at a very attractive valuation and hold an extremely healthy minority stake which obviously has been diluted over time. I think the network effects are so large that it is hard for others to get into it. I am still a shareholder and looking forward to the initial public offering. I invested in 2012 and when I met Bhavish first, I did not understand the problem he was solving as I live in Mumbai where cabs are available. So I did not think there was a problem. A few days later when I was in Delhi and needed a cab, I was told that they would call a taxi stand. After I came back from Delhi, I realised there was a problem everywhere. And I used to call the call centre and Bhavish used to answer the call centre, which showed me his commitment and reminded me of myself when I had started and so I invested.

Anupam Mittal hits out at Google — 'Tech bullies need one arm chopped off in the form of penalties'

Mumbai, D'chica's, a brand that curates puberty-essential products tailored specifically to the needs and preferences of teen girls, has bagged a deal of Rs 80 lakhs with <keyword id="20292047" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="namita-thapar" source="keywords">Namita Thapar</keyword> and Vineeta Singh on the new episode of '<keyword id="19913228" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank-india" source="keywords">Shark Tank India</keyword> 3'. In a bid to propel D'chica to new heights of success, its co-founders, Richa Kapila and <keyword id="20348209" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="vani" source="keywords">Vani</keyword> Chugh from Delhi made a debut on the business reality show. From stylish bras and period panties to fashionable athleisure and footwear, the brand strives to empower young girls during their crucial teenage years with its meticulously crafted collection. Bound by both family ties as sisters-in-law and a shared passion for business, Richa and Vani, the founders of D'chica, embarked on a new entrepreneurial journey after facing setbacks with their previous venture focused on infants and toddlers. Despite the challenges that led to the closure of their initial business, the sisters-in-law remained undeterred. Instead, they embraced failure as a powerful teacher, drawing invaluable lessons from the experience. In 2019, they founded D'chica, a brand committed to celebrating the transition from adolescence to womanhood. They launched their first inner wear collection in 2020. Through their determination and hard work, Richa and Vani transformed D'chica into a brand that resonates with the Alpha and Gen Z generations. On the show, they asked for Rs 80 lakhs in exchange for one per cent equity. Amit Jain, CEO and co-founder of CarDekho Group, asked: "Do you do the manufacturing yourself or have you given a contract to someone for it?" Richa replied saying, "We currently have five manufacturing units which we operate out of." After seeing the products, <keyword id="20380308" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="namita" source="keywords">Namita</keyword> Thapar, executive director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd, said: "Dr. Garima is a new angel (pointing to the packaging)." To which the founders replied: "Dr. Garima is a consulting gynaecologist with us. We have onboarded a gynaecologist whom customers can reach out to for guidance. We do it for community building." Finally, they sealed the deal with Namita and Vineeta (Co-Founder and CEO of SUGAR Cosmetics), at Rs 80 lakhs for two per cent equity plus one per cent royalty until the sum is recouped. Sharing her excitement on being a part of the 'Shark Tank India', Vani Chugh, co-founder D'chica Fashion Lifestyle Private Ltd, said: "Shark Tank India helped our teen and young women inner-wear brand D'chica reach millions of Indian homes and create mainstream conversations about subjects as taboo as periods to common youth issues like body image and confidence." "With our body adapting bras, reusable period panties and chafing-free underwear D'chica is laser focused on the fast growing market of 12 crore plus girls," she added. 'Shark Tank India 3' streams on Sony LIV.

Body-adapting bras, reusable period panties & more help this startup bag ₹80 lakh from 'sharks'

'<keyword id="20653768" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="chefling" source="keywords">Chefling</keyword>', a unique do-it-yourself (DIY) kit that includes all the ingredients needed to make a tasty global recipe, has sealed a deal of Rs 40 lakh with four sharks on the business reality show '<keyword id="19913228" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank-india" source="keywords">Shark Tank India</keyword>' season 3. Hailing from Mumbai, the 25-year-old <keyword id="20649763" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="rounit-gambhir" source="keywords">Rounit Gambhir</keyword>, founder of Chefling, introduced this innovative concept of, aiming to streamline the preparation of exotic cuisines. Seizing the opportunity during the lockdown, this young entrepreneur launched his product in Mumbai. Chefling seeks to offer individuals a personalised, cutting-edge gourmet experience that is not only enjoyable and delicious but also affordable. Rounit's vision is rooted in the desire to simplify the process of cooking fancy dishes for enthusiasts with time constraints. The types of DIY kits available are -- Japanese: Sushi and Mochi; Mexican: Enchilada and Taco; and Italian: Lasagna. Talking about his brand, Rounit said: "The company was started in August 2020, and we have sold more than 5,000 kits pan India till date. The kits are available on our own website." "The Indian DIY meal kit market size by the year 2025 will reach around Rs 8,000 crore, and we want the global cuisines to reach every household in India, and Indian cuisines to reach worldwide, so that their experience is economical, easy and sustainable," shared Rounit. He then made a pitch of Rs 40 lakh for 10 per cent equity. Anupam Mittal, the founder and CEO of Shaadi.com said: "Sushi was very good. Thank you for feeding us. The young pitcher further talked about his entrepreneurial journey. Fueled by the determination to rise above his father's company losses and bankruptcy, Rounit harnessed this setback as an opportunity in a market where culinary experimentation is a universal desire. Chefling emerged as the answer to the complexities faced by aspiring home chefs, making it a culinary haven that eliminates hassles and brings the joy of cooking straight to our homes. The compelling pitch and unique brand captured the attention of shark Namita Thapar, the executive director of Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd, who took on the challenge of crafting the perfect sushi roll on 'Shark Tank India 3'. And with that, 'Chefling' secured a deal with sharks Namita Thapar, Azhar Iqubal (Co-founder and CEO of Inshorts), Amit Jain (CEO and Co-founder of CarDekho Group), and <keyword id="20313422" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="peyush-bansal" source="keywords">Peyush Bansal</keyword> (Co-founder and CEO of Lenskart), at Rs 40 lakh for 16 per cent equity. Speaking about the experience on the show, Rounit shared: "Over the past three years, belief in connecting our unique idea with the right audience fueled our journey through highs and lows. This belief sustained us through challenges, leading to a pivotal moment when Shark Tank India expressed interest in featuring Chefling." 'Shark Tank India 3' is streaming on Sony LIV. SEE ALSO:<a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/google-pixel-8-pro-review/articleshow/107726935.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/google-pixel-8-pro-review/articleshow/107726935.cms" target="_blank">Pixel 8 Pro review: ‘Okay Google’ – The flagship smartphone ticks almost all boxes</a><a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/poco-oneplus-top-indian-smartphone-shipment-growth-but-overall-reading-flat/articleshow/107681294.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/mobile/news/poco-oneplus-top-indian-smartphone-shipment-growth-but-overall-reading-flat/articleshow/107681294.cms" target="_blank">Poco, OnePlus top Indian smartphone shipment growth but overall reading flat</a><a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/auto/news/ola-electric-cuts-prices-of-scooters-to-compete-with-ice-two-wheelers/articleshow/107816897.cms" target="_blank"></a> <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/auto/news/ola-electric-cuts-prices-of-scooters-to-compete-with-ice-two-wheelers/articleshow/107816897.cms" target="_blank">Ola Electric cuts prices of scooters to compete with ICE two-wheelers</a>

A DIY cooking kit maker Chefling raises ₹40 lakhs from four 'sharks'

<ul class="summary-list"><li>Beauty brand Youthforia is facing backlash for selling a dark foundation shade comparable to "tar."</li><li>The brand was previously criticized for its foundation range being too light for deeper complexions.</li></ul>When content creator <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@golloria">Golloria George</a> reviewed Youthforia's Date Night Foundation <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@golloria/video/7283587716787211551?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">in September 2023</a>, she highlighted two major problems with the range's darkest shade.First, the beauty influencer noted that the product — and the rest of its then-15-count shade range — was too light for people with deep complexions like hers, which Youthforia CEO Fiona Co Chan <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/youthforia-criticized-black-influencers-deep-makeup-shade-rcna150044">apologized for at the time</a>.Second, George said the shade was advertised to look much darker on its packaging and in online photos than it applied in real life.So, when Youthforia launched 10 new makeup shades in March, George gave the new darkest option — shade 600 — a chance.But this time, Youthforia's foundation looked too dark, almost like "tar in a bottle," <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@golloria/video/7363386668264557867?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">according to George</a>. She proved her point by applying the brand's foundation on one side of her face and solid-black face paint on the other to show how similar they were.She also tried Youthforia's foundation in <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@golloria/video/7363465609889434926?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">its second-darkest shade</a>, number 590, which was drastically lighter in tone and also didn't match her complexion."When we say that we want you guys to make shades for us, we don't mean to go to the lab and ask for minstrel-show black," the influencer said in her TikTok review shared on Monday, referencing 1800s theater productions in which actors wore blackface and perpetuated racist stereotypes. "What we mean is to take the browns that you have made, create undertones, and do what you need to do in the lab so it's a darker shade of brown."Representatives for George and Youthforia did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. The California-based beauty brand was founded in 2021 and rose to fame after appearing on a 2023 episode of "Shark Tank," during which <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="c-link c-link--underline" href="https://youtu.be/z7q4UHtn4qM?si=5gHm1h2MJ9P5S4ys">Mark Cuban</a> invested in the brand.The company also became popular on TikTok after its <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="c-link c-link--underline" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-shopper/2023/08/23/youthforia-blush/?sh=252e442c34ce">color-changing blush went viral</a> in September of last year, and its products are now sold at Ulta Beauty. The beauty chain did not immediately respond to a request for comment from BI.<h2>Widespread beauty backlash</h2>Following George's video, beauty fans and creators across the internet have criticized Youthforia and its attempt to make its foundation range more inclusive."Unfollowing because of that malicious attempt at placating black consumers," one person wrote on the brand's Instagram page, where comments are now limited.Beauty YouTuber Jackie Aina also commented "deep heavy spiritual sigh" on George's review, and TikToker and cosmetic developer <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@thelipsticklesbians/video/7363777532073643307?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">The Lipstick Lesbian</a> called it a "master class in what not to do when trying to be inclusive." Meanwhile, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@javonford16/video/7363463089880075562?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">Javon Ford</a>, a cosmetic chemist, explained the formulation of different shades in the line and said the darkest one was made with "pure black pigment."George posted <a target="_blank" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@golloria/video/7364077204130565419?is_from_webapp=1&amp;sender_device=pc&amp;web_id=7289141024454592043">another TikTok video</a> on Wednesday, which she captioned: "It's biologically impossible to be PURE black. there is no pigment in this foundation other than pure BLACK oxide. this was not a mistake." <h2>Problems from the start</h2>Weeks before George's TikTok review, Youthforia shared <a target="_blank" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4WOLdzrL90/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link">a video</a> about its struggles to find someone to model shade 600 of its foundation."We held a casting call open to the public, but didn't have any attendees who showed up that were within the 600 shade range, which is what led to this journey to find a 600 model!" the brand wrote on Instagram.So, Youthforia "street cast" two men and shared a video montage of their impromptu photo shoot.While some people in the comment section applauded the brand for its efforts, other beauty fans didn't believe the makeup matched their skin tones either."Hi! I don't think it matched them that well. Shade 600 seems to have no undertone, but it looks like they had more of a red undertone. In my opinion, I think there should be 2 or 3 shades between 590 and 600! " one person wrote in response to the video.Youthforia has yet to comment on this latest controversy publicly, and its founder has seemingly made her Instagram account private. Beauty brands have widely been working toward becoming more inclusive in recent years.Specifically, Rihanna's Fenty Beauty changed the game with its massive foundation range — it now boasts 51 shades — and the foundation from Halsey's brand About Face has become a new favorite. It offers 45 diverse shades.

A 'Shark Tank' beauty brand was criticized for lacking deep foundation shades. It tried to fix it and made it worse.

<ul><li><keyword id="13768438" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="Shark-Tank-India-season-2" source="Orion">Shark Tank India Season 2</keyword> returned but without two of the former judges - Mamaearth co-founder Ghazal Alagh, and BharatPe co-founder Ashneer Grover. </li><li>Amit Jain, the co-founder and CEO of CarDekho, is the new judge this season. </li><li>Apart from Jain, the show will have five other judges in Season 2 - all of whom appeared in Season 1 as well. </li></ul>The hit reality show, <keyword id="11924074" type="General" weightage="20" keywordseo="shark-tank-india" source="Orion">Shark Tank India</keyword>, has returned for a second season and already started taking over the conversation on social media. The show will air on Sony TV at 10 pm from Monday to Friday, and is also available for streaming online on SonyLiv. The premiere episode of season 2 served several gems, as everyone’s favourite judges returned- along with the new addition, CarDekho co-founder, Amit Jain. Here’s a look at all the sharks from Season 2: <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Vineeta Singh" comment="subhead2" text="Vineeta Singh">Vineeta Singh</cmsannotation> The <a href="https://in.linkedin.com/in/vineetasingh">founder </a>of Sugar Cosmetics, Vineeta Singh is an alumnus of the IIM Ahmedabad and IIT Madras. She started Sugar Cosmetics in 2015. Before Sugar Cosmetics, she also co-founded Fab Bag (earlier Vellvette.com) in 2012. On the premiere episode of Season 2, Singh, along with fellow judge Namita Thapar, invested in a business idea they rejected in season 1 - JhaJi by entrepreneur duo from <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9Y2sATRkac&amp;ab_channel=SonyPicturesEntertainmentIndia">Bihar’s Darbhanga</a>, sisters-in-law Uma and Kalpana Jha. The duo has asked for ₹50 lakh and 10% equity in Season 1. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Peyush Bansal" comment="subhead2" text="Peyush Bansal">Peyush Bansal</cmsannotation> The co-founder of Lenskart, Peyush Bansal recently appeared with fellow judges on the reality show Kaun Banega Crorepati? where he talked about how he was prompted to start a business after <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoilrCHrFCE&amp;ab_channel=Lenskart">being “inspired” </a>by his interaction with entrepreneur and founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates. Bansal is an alumnus of the IIM Bangalore, and also holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering Honors (Electrical - IT, Control &amp; Automation) from McGill University. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Aman Gupta" comment="subhead2" text="Aman Gupta">Aman Gupta</cmsannotation> One of the most loved judges from season 1, Aman Gupta is the co-founder of boAt. A chartered accountant, Gupta attended the Indian School of Business and was also an exchange student at the Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management. Gupta worked with the financial consultancy firm KPMG before he started boAt in 2016. As per reports, boAt <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/shark-tank-india-season-2-meet-the-six-judges-who-will-hear-the-pitches-amit-jain-aman-gupta-vineeta-singh-ashneer-grover-3658227">registered a revenue of ₹3,000 crore </a>at the end of FY22. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Anupam Mittal" comment="subhead2" text="Anupam Mittal">Anupam Mittal</cmsannotation> The founder of Shaadi.com, Anupam Mittal attended Boston College. Aged 51, he is one of the oldest sharks on the show and claims to have invested in over 150 companies in the last 15 <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/shark-tank-india-season-2-meet-the-six-judges-who-will-hear-the-pitches-amit-jain-aman-gupta-vineeta-singh-ashneer-grover-3658227">years. </a> Mittal is also the co-founder of People Group–the parent company behind Shaadi.com–which has created businesses like Makaan.com, Mauj Mobile and produced films like Flavors. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Namita Thapar" comment="subhead2" text="Namita Thapar">Namita Thapar</cmsannotation> A chartered accountant like fellow shark Aman Gupta, Thapar obtained a Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from Duke University - The Fuqua School in 2001. She then worked with global healthcare leader Abbott for five years, before returning to India to join her father’s pharma giant, Emcure Pharmaceuticals. A recipient of the ET ‘40 under Forty’ award, Thapar is a huge fan of actor Amitabh Bachchan - so much so, that she <a href="https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/kaun-banega-crorepati-14-shark-tanks-namita-thapar-tells-amitabh-bachchan-she-named-her-sons-after-jai-and-veeru/articleshow/96567872.cms">revealed </a>she’s even named her sons Jai and Veeru, inspired by Bachchan’s hit film Sholay. <cmsannotation type="cmsannotation" annotationid="Amit Jain" comment="subhead2" text="Amit Jain">Amit Jain</cmsannotation> The only judge to be making his debut in Season 2, <a href="https://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/news/shark-tank-season-2-is-here-but-popular-shark-ashneer-grover-is-missing-meet-the-new-shark/slidelist/95271549.cms">Amit Jain </a>is the CEO and co-founder of CarDekho. An alumnus of IIT Delhi, Jain started his professional career as a software engineer with Tata Consultancy Services. Jain started CarDekho with his brother after the duo was <a href="https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/shark-tank-india-season-2-meet-the-six-judges-who-will-hear-the-pitches-amit-jain-aman-gupta-vineeta-singh-ashneer-grover-3658227">reportedly</a> inspired after a visit to Auto Expo in 2008. SEE ALSO: <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/sustainability/news/delhi-could-transition-to-almost-100-renewable-energy-by-2050-study/articleshow/96697920.cms">Delhi could transition to almost 100% renewable energy by 2050: study</a> <a target="_blank" class="c-link c-message_attachment__title_link" href="https://www.businessinsider.in/business/news/leasing-by-flex-space-operators-hits-a-new-high-of-7-million-sq-ft-in-2022-colliers/articleshow/96713121.cms">Leasing by flex space operators hits a new high of 7 million sq.ft in 2022: Colliers</a>

You Searched For "shark tank india episodes" and got 7 results

Roasted shark? Ashneer Grover faces backlash over legal tussle with comedian Aashish Solanki

Ashmita Gupta

Founders should do this surprising thing more often in pitches, Daniel Lubetzky, the newest 'Shark Tank' addition, says

Alex Bitter

Anupam Mittal hits out at Google — 'Tech bullies need one arm chopped off in the form of penalties'

Malini Bhupta

Body-adapting bras, reusable period panties & more help this startup bag ₹80 lakh from 'sharks'

IANS

A DIY cooking kit maker Chefling raises ₹40 lakhs from four 'sharks'

IANS

A 'Shark Tank' beauty brand was criticized for lacking deep foundation shades. It tried to fix it and made it worse.

Amanda Krause

Shark Tank India S2’s sharks: Meet the serial investors, CAs, and IIT, IIM alumni

Srishti Magan

Popular Keywords

Buying Guides